Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163567›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2020

Opicapone Efficacy and Tolerability in Parkinson's Disease Patients Reporting Insufficient Benefit/Failure of Entacapone.

Petr Vokurka, Andrew Barron, Sheetal Sumaria, Lindsey Stockford, Paul Jarman, Kailash Bhatia, Simon Farmer, Tabish Saifee, Tom Warner, Rimona Weil and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Discovery of Small Molecules as Membrane-Bound Catechol-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Petr VokurkaDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.
Andrew BarronThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Sheetal SumariaThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Lindsey StockfordThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Paul JarmanThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Kailash BhatiaDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8185-286X
Simon FarmerThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Tabish SaifeeDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.
Tom WarnerDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.
Rimona WeilThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-6325
Sonia GandhiDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.
Patricia LimousinDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.
Prasad KorliparaThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square London UK.
Tom FoltynieDepartment of Clinical & Movement Neurosciences University College London Institute of Neurology London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-1813
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T008199/1Wellcome Trust 205167/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpicapone, a recently introduced catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor has the advantage of being administered once daily, and has pharmacokinetic data to indicate it offers a greater degree of COMT inhibition than entacapone. Although trial data indicate it is non-inferior to entacapone, there are no data to indicate whether it offers any clinical advantages.

methodsIn this audit, we present data from 57 individuals prescribed opicapone at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square who had either not tolerated or reported insufficient benefit following previous prescription of entacapone.

resultsA total of 20 of 57 patients switched directly from entacapone to opicapone ("entacapone switchers") whereas 37 of 57 patients had previously discontinued entacapone because of lack of benefit or adverse events ("entacapone failures"). A total of 21 of 57 (37%) patients stopped opicapone prior to 6 months. A total of 7 of 20 (35%) "entacapone switchers" experienced adverse events with opicapone of which 5 stopped the drug prior to the 6 month evaluation of efficacy. A total of 23 of 37 (62%) "entacapone failures" reported adverse events of which 16 stopped the drug. Among 36 of 57 (63%) patients who continued to use opicapone at 6 months, there was an improvement in OFF time of ~2 hours per day as measured by interview.

conclusionsWe conclude that opicapone can be an effective additional treatment for wearing off in Parkinson's disease (PD) in a subgroup of patients. The use of opicapone in our cohort with prior entacapone exposure, however, was associated with higher rates of adverse effects and treatment discontinuation than reported in published trial data of COMT inhibitor naïve patients.

Indexed as

auditentacaponeopicapone

Identifiers

PMID33163567
PMCPMC7604656
OpenAlexW3092545712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.