Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163535›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

The Value of Enhanced MR Radiomics in Estimating the IDH1 Genotype in High-Grade Gliomas.

Lei Niu, Wei-Hua Feng, Chong-Feng Duan, Ying-Chao Liu, Ji-Hua Liu, Xue-Jun Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Accuracy of Radiomics in PredictingRadiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Application of Enhanced T1WI of MRI Radiomics in Glioma Grading.International journal of clinical practice · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei NiuRadiology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
Wei-Hua FengRadiology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
Chong-Feng DuanRadiology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
Ying-Chao LiuNeurosurgery Department, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China 250021.
Ji-Hua LiuRadiology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.
Xue-Jun LiuRadiology Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3250-4778
Qingdao University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of IDH1-mutant glioma is significantly better than that of wild-type glioma, and the preoperative identification of IDH mutations in glioma is essential for the formulation of surgical procedures and prognostic assessment. PURPOSE: To explore the value of a radiomic model based on preoperative-enhanced MR images in the assessment of the IDH1 genotype in high-grade glioma. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 182 patients with high-grade glioma confirmed by surgical pathology between December 2012 and January 2019 in our hospital with complete preoperative brain-enhanced MR images, including 79 patients with an IDH1 mutation (45 patients with WHO grade III and 34 patients with WHO grade IV) and 103 patients with wild-type IDH1 (33 patients with WHO grade III and 70 patients with WHO grade IV). Patients were divided into a primary dataset and a validation dataset at a ratio of 7 : 3 using a stratified random sampling; radiomic features were extracted using A.K. (Analysis Kit, GE Healthcare) software and were initially reduced using the Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman analyses. Lasso was finally conducted to obtain the optimized subset of the feature to build the radiomic model, and the model was then tested with cross-validation. ROC (receiver operating characteristic curve) analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the model.

resultsThe radiomic model showed good discrimination in both the primary dataset (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.754 to 0.855, ACC = 0.798, sensitivity = 85.5%, specificity = 75.4%, positive predictive value = 0.734, and negative predictive value = 0.867) and the validation dataset (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.690 to 0.913, ACC = 0.789, sensitivity = 91.3%, specificity = 69.0%, positive predictive value = 0.700, and negative predictive value = 0.909).

conclusionThe radiomic model, based on the preoperative-enhanced MR, can effectively predict the IDH1 genotype in high-grade glioma.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsChildFemaleGenotypeGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMutationIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID33163535
PMCPMC7604586
OpenAlexW3093564234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.