Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163332›Full record

ReviewPreventive medicine reports2020

Can physical activity measurement alone improve objectively-measured physical activity in primary care?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nicole Freene, Rachel Davey, Rahanan Sathiyakumar, Steven M McPhail

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How can GPs get people moving more?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole FreenePhysiotherapy, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
Rachel DaveyHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
Rahanan SathiyakumarHealth Research Institute, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.
Steven M McPhailSchool of Public Health & Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.
University of Canberra · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is evidence that simply measuring physical activity alone can increase self-reported physical activity behaviour. The aim of this review was to describe changes in objectively-measured physical activity within control groups in primary care physical activity intervention studies. Five electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, PsychINFO and CINAHL) were searched from inception to February 2019. Physical activity controlled intervention studies objectively measuring physical activity in primary care with adults were included and

Indexed as

AccelerometryMeasurementMeasurement reactivityPedometer

Identifiers

PMID33163332
PMCPMC7607506
OpenAlexW3093495327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.