Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163322›Full record

Review3 Biotech2020

Potato dry rot disease: current status, pathogenomics and management.

Rahul Kumar Tiwari, Ravinder Kumar, Sanjeev Sharma, Vinay Sagar, Rashmi Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra Naga, Milan Kumar Lal, Kumar Nishant Chourasia, Dharmendra Kumar, Manoj Kumar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in 3 Biotech, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Elicitor fromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An integrative re-evaluation of theStudies in mycology · 2025
    Article
  11. Inhibitory Effect and Mechanism of Dryocrassin ABBA AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Short impact on soil microbiome of aFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul Kumar TiwariICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Ravinder KumarICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.ORCID 0000-0001-9034-7742
Sanjeev SharmaICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Vinay SagarICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Rashmi AggarwalICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012 India.
Kailash Chandra NagaICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Milan Kumar LalICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Kumar Nishant ChourasiaICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Dharmendra KumarICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Manoj KumarICAR-Central Potato Research Institute, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh 171 001 India.
Central Potato Research Institute · INIndian Agricultural Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potato dry rot disease caused by

Indexed as

Fusarium dry rotManagementPathogenomicsPotatoToxinsTuber

Identifiers

PMID33163322
PMCPMC7609731
OpenAlexW3096665805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.