ArticleF1000Research2020
Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol.
Article in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Interrupted time series datasets from studies investigating the impact of interventions or exposures in public health and social science: a data note.BMC research notes · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: an empirical study.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A simulation study.Research synthesis methods · 2023Pooled it
- Expected population prevalence following decriminalization of recreational use of cannabis in Sweden.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- Methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: A methodological systematic review protocol.F1000Research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.