Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163134›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2020

Rotational manipulation of a microscopic object inside a microfluidic channel.

Hiroyuki Harada, Makoto Kaneko, Hiroaki Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hiroyuki HaradaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Makoto KanekoDivision of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Meijo University, Aichi 468-0073, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4922-3761
Hiroaki ItoDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3769-7115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observations and analyses of a microscopic object are essential processes in various fields such as chemical engineering and life science. Microfluidic techniques with various functions and extensions have often been used for such purposes to investigate the mechanical properties of microscopic objects such as biological cells. One of such extensions proposed in this context is a real-time visual feedback manipulation system, which is composed of a high-speed camera and a piezoelectric actuator with a single-line microfluidic channel. Although the on-chip manipulation system enables us to control the 1 degree-of-freedom position of a target object by the real-time pressure control, it has suffered from unintended changes in the object orientation, which is out of control in the previous system. In this study, we propose and demonstrate a novel shear-flow-based mechanism for the control of the orientation of a target object in addition to the position control in a microchannel to overcome the problem of the unintended rotation. We designed a tributary channel using a three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulation with boundary conditions appropriate for the particle manipulation to apply shear stress to the target particle placed at the junction and succeeded in rotating the particle at an angular velocity of 0.2 rad/s even under the position control in the experiment. The proposed mechanism would be applied to feedback controls of a target object in a microchannel to be in a desired orientation and at a desired position, which could be a universally useful function for various microfluidic platforms.

Identifiers

PMID33163134
PMCPMC7595745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.