ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2020
Welfare of cattle at slaughter.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common carotid artery occlusion during slaughter without stunning in cattle: incidence and evidence for physiological significance-a systematic review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Pooled it
- Electroencephalography, behavioural observations, bleed-out and temperature at the point of application in cattle receiving DTS: Diathermic Syncope® at 160-200 kJ.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Article
- The use of Diathermic Syncope® for stunning cattle.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Abattoir-Level Beef Cattle Handling and Its Impact on Meat Quality: A Comparative Analysis of Three Abattoirs of Eastern Amhara, Ethiopia.Veterinary medicine international · 2026Article
- Indicators of loss of consciousness in slaughter without stunning: a neuroanatomical reappraisal.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Applying and adapting the welfare qualityJournal of animal science and technology · 2025Article
- An assessment of cetacean welfare in the Faroe Islands' drive hunt.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Advances in the Study of Pluripotent Stem Cells in Livestock.Cell proliferation · 2025Review
- Welfare of American mink, red and Arctic foxes, raccoon dog and chinchilla kept for fur production.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Assessing the use of a mechanical rump pusher in a commercial cattle slaughter plant.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2025Article
- Commentary: A Comparison of the Methods of the Pre-Slaughter Stunning of Cattle in Australia-Mechanical, Electrical, and Diathermic Syncope.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Animal Stress and Welfare During Transport and Slaughtering: An Outline for Future Policies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Opportunities to Improve Animal Welfare during Transport and Slaughter of Cattle and Pigs through Staff Training-Results of a Delphi Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Opportunities for Regulatory Authorities to Assess Animal-Based Measures at the Slaughterhouse Using Sensor Technology and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Exploring Consumer Preference towards the On-Farm Slaughtering of Beef in Germany: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Slaughtering of Water Buffalo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Animal Welfare during Transport and Slaughter of Cattle: A Systematic Review of Studies in the European Legal Framework.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Importance of Knife Sharpness during Slaughter: Shariah and Kosher Perspective and Scientific Validation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Welfare of calves.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Welfare of broilers on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The killing of cattle for human consumption (slaughtering) can take place in a slaughterhouse or on farm. The processes of slaughtering that were assessed for welfare, from the arrival of cattle until their death (including slaughtering without stunning), were grouped into three main phases: pre-stunning (including arrival, unloading from the truck, lairage, handling and moving of cattle); stunning (including restraint); and bleeding. Stunning methods were grouped into two categories: mechanical and electrical. Twelve welfare consequences that cattle may be exposed to during slaughter were identified: heat stress, cold stress, fatigue, prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, impeded movement, restriction of movements, resting problems (inability to rest or discomfort during resting), social stress, pain, fear and distress. Welfare consequences and their relevant animal-based measures are described. In total, 40 welfare hazards that could occur during slaughter were identified and characterised, most of them related to stunning and bleeding. Staff were identified as the origin of 39 hazards, which were attributed to the lack of appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or to fatigue. Measures to prevent and correct hazards were identified, and structural and managerial measures were identified as those with a crucial role in prevention. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal-based measures, origin of hazards, and preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.