ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2020
Shapelet Discovery by Lazy Time Series Classification.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a representation of discriminative features, the time series shapelet has recently received considerable research interest. However, most shapelet-based classification models evaluate the differential ability of the shapelet on the whole training dataset, neglecting characteristic information contained in each instance to be classified and the classwise feature frequency information. Hence, the computational complexity of feature extraction is high, and the interpretability is inadequate. To this end, the efficiency of shapelet discovery is improved through a lazy strategy fusing global and local similarities. In the prediction process, the strategy learns a specific evaluation dataset for each instance, and then the captured characteristics are directly used to progressively reduce the uncertainty of the predicted class label. Moreover, a shapelet coverage score is defined to calculate the discriminability of each time stamp for different classes. The experimental results show that the proposed method is competitive with the benchmark methods and provides insight into the discriminative features of each time series and each type in the data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.