Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162882›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2020

Mapping of the Spinal Sensorimotor Network by Transvertebral and Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Polina Shkorbatova, Vsevolod Lyakhovetskii, Natalia Pavlova, Alexander Popov, Elena Bazhenova, Daria Kalinina, Oleg Gorskii, Pavel Musienko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Forward Stepping Evoked by Transvertebral Stimulation in the Decerebrate Cat.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Polina ShkorbatovaInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Vsevolod LyakhovetskiiPavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia PavlovaInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Alexander PopovPavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Elena BazhenovaInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Daria KalininaInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Oleg GorskiiInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Pavel MusienkoInstitute of Translational Biomedicine, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Pavlov Institute of Physiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUSt Petersburg University · RURussian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous stimulation is a neuromodulation method that is efficiently used for recovery after spinal cord injury and other disorders that are accompanied by motor and sensory deficits. Multiple aspects of transcutaneous stimulation optimization still require testing in animal experiments including the use of pharmacological agents, spinal lesions, cell recording, etc. This need initially motivated us to develop a new approach of transvertebral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and to test its feasibility in acute and chronic experiments on rats. The aims of the current work were to study the selectivity of muscle activation over the lower thoracic and lumbosacral spinal cord when the stimulating electrode was located intravertebrally and to compare its effectiveness to that of the clinically used transcutaneous stimulation. In decerebrated rats, electromyographic activity was recorded in the muscles of the back (m. longissimus dorsi), tail (m. abductor caudae dorsalis), and hindlimb (mm. iliacus, adductor magnus, vastus lateralis, semitendinosus, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, soleus, and flexor hallucis longus) during SCS with an electrode placed alternately in one of the spinous processes of the VT12-VS1 vertebrae. The recruitment curves for motor and sensory components of the evoked potentials (separated from each other by means of double-pulse stimulation) were plotted for each muscle; their slopes characterized the effectiveness of the muscle activation. The electrophysiological mapping demonstrated that transvertebral SCS has specific effects to the rostrocaudally distributed sensorimotor network of the lower thoracic and lumbosacral cord, mainly by stimulation of the roots that carry the sensory and motor spinal pathways. These effects were compared in the same animals when mapping was performed by transcutaneous stimulation, and similar distribution of muscle activity and underlying neuroanatomical mechanisms were found. The experiments on chronic rats validated the feasibility of the proposed stimulation approach of transvertebral SCS for further studies.

Indexed as

decerebrated ratneuromodulationsensorimotor networkspinal cordtranscutaneous stimulationtransvertebral spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33162882
PMCPMC7581734
OpenAlexW3096747238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.