Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Sensitivity of Neuroimaging Indicators in Monitoring the Effects of Interferon Gamma Treatment in Friedreich's Ataxia.

Marinela Vavla, Filippo Arrigoni, Nicola Toschi, Denis Peruzzo, Maria Grazia D'Angelo, Sandra Gandossini, Annamaria Russo, Eleonora Diella, Stefania Tirelli, Roberto Salati and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Friedreich ataxia: clinical features and new developments.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Drug Repositioning in Friedreich Ataxia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marinela VavlaIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Filippo ArrigoniIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Nicola ToschiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata, " Rome, Italy.
Denis PeruzzoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Maria Grazia D'AngeloIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Sandra GandossiniIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Annamaria RussoIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Eleonora DiellaIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Stefania TirelliIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Roberto SalatiIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Alessandra RufiniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata, " Rome, Italy.
Ivano CondoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata, " Rome, Italy.
Roberto TestiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata, " Rome, Italy.
Andrea MartinuzziIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) E. Medea Scientific Institute, Bosisio Parini, Italy.
IRCCS Eugenio Medea · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of efficient markers of disease progression and response to possibly effective treatments is a key priority for slowly progressive, rare and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Friedreich's ataxia. Various imaging modalities have documented specific abnormalities in Friedreich's ataxia that could be tracked to provide useful indicators of efficacy in clinical trials. Advanced MRI imaging (diffusion tensor imaging, DTI; functional MRI, fMRI; and resting-state fMRI, rs-fMRI) and retinal imaging (optical coherence tomography, OCT) were tested longitudinally in a small group of Friedreich's ataxia patients participating in an open-label clinical trial testing the safety and the efficacy of 6-month treatment with interferon gamma. While the DTI indices documented the slow progression of fractional anisotropy loss, fMRI and rs-fMRI were significantly modified during and after treatment. The fMRI changes significantly correlated with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, which is used to monitor clinical response. OCT documented the known thickness reduction of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, but there was no change over time. This pilot study provides indications for the potential utility of fMRI and rs-fMRI as ancillary measures in clinical trials for Friedreich's ataxia.

Indexed as

fMRIFriedreich’s ataxianeuroimagingresting-state fMRItask fMRItrial

Identifiers

PMID33162876
PMCPMC7583645
OpenAlexW3092609294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.