Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162676›Full record

ArticleSafety science2021

Strategies to exiting the COVID-19 lockdown for workplace and school: A scoping review.

Daniela D'angelo, Alessandra Sinopoli, Antonello Napoletano, Silvia Gianola, Greta Castellini, Andrea Del Monaco, Alice Josephine Fauci, Roberto Latina, Laura Iacorossi, Katia Salomone and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Safety science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Risk Perception Influence on Vaccination Program on COVID-19 in Chile: A Mathematical Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Emergency Remote Education, Family Support and the Digital Divide in the Context of the COVID-19 Lockdown.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela D'angeloCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra SinopoliDepartment of Prevention, Local Health Unit Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Antonello NapoletanoCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Silvia GianolaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Greta CastelliniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Del MonacoDirectorate General for Economics, Statistics and Research, Bank of Italy, Rome, Italy.
Alice Josephine FauciCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Roberto LatinaCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Laura IacorossiCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Katia SalomoneCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Daniela CocliteCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Primiano IannoneCentro Eccellenza Clinica, Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITBank of Italy · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to curb the COVID-19 pandemic, several countries have implemented various social restrictions, such as closing schools and asking people to work from home. Nevertheless, after months of strict quarantine, a reopening of society is required. Many countries are planning exit strategies to progressively lift the lockdown without leading to an increase in the number of COVID-19 cases. Identifying exit strategies for a safe reopening of schools and places of work is critical in informing decision-makers on the management of the COVID-19 health crisis. This scoping review describes multiple population-wide strategies, including social distancing, testing, and contact tracing. It highlights how each strategy needs to be based on both the epidemiological situation and contextualize at local circumstances to anticipate the possibility of COVID-19 resurgence. However, the retrieved evidence lacks operational solutions and are mainly based on mathematical models and derived from grey literature. There is a need to report the impact of the implementation of country-tailored strategies and assess their effectiveness through high-quality experimental studies.

Indexed as

Covid-19Exit strategySchoolWork

Identifiers

PMID33162676
PMCPMC7604014
OpenAlexW3096657394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.