Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162665›Full record

ArticlePhysica A2021

Count regression models for COVID-19.

Stephen Chan, Jeffrey Chu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Saralees Nadarajah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessment of uncertainty quantification in universal differential equations.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of reporting lag in daily data of COVID-19 in Japan.Letters in spatial and resource sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. The distribution of COVID-19 mortality.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephen ChanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Jeffrey ChuDepartment of Statistics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain.
Yuanyuan ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Saralees NadarajahDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the end of 2019, the current novel coronavirus emerged as a severe acute respiratory disease that has now become a worldwide pandemic. Future generations will look back on this difficult period and see how our society as a whole united and rose to this challenge. Many reports have suggested that this new virus is becoming comparable to the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918. We provide a statistical study on the modelling and analysis of the daily incidence of COVID-19 in eighteen countries around the world. In particular, we investigate whether it is possible to fit count regression models to the number of daily new cases of COVID-19 in various countries and make short term predictions of these numbers. The results suggest that the biggest advantage of these methods is that they are simplistic and straightforward allowing us to obtain preliminary results and an overall picture of the trends in the daily confirmed cases of COVID-19 around the world. The best fitting count regression model for modelling the number of new daily COVID-19 cases of all countries analysed was shown to be a negative binomial distribution with log link function. Whilst the results cannot solely be used to determine and influence policy decisions, they provide an alternative to more specialised epidemiological models and can help to support or contradict results obtained from other analysis.

Indexed as

CoronavirusEpidemiologyNegative binomial distributionPoisson distribution

Identifiers

PMID33162665
PMCPMC7604061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.