ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2020
An observational study to assess the possibility of patient participation in implementing pharmacovigilance in a busy tertiary care hospital.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strengthening pharmacovigilance through patient reporting: a scoping review of awareness, barriers, and facilitators.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
- Demographic determinants of patient satisfaction in medical outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in North India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Consumers' knowledge and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting in Australia: a national survey.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdverse drug reactions are an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Monitoring adverse drug reaction is the primary function of Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI). The national program at the inception allowed only physicians, nurses, and pharmacists to report adverse drug reactions but has recently permitted even the consumers or patients to report. The knowledge, attitude, and practice of patients toward such a program have not been studied, and hence, the present study was conducted to assess the same.
methodsA questionnaire was prepared based on the review of literature and was filled up by the interviewer based on inputs from patients attending various outpatient departments and dispensary of a tertiary care center after obtaining informed consent. Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out, and the results are expressed in terms of means and proportions for continuous and categorical data, respectively.
resultsMajority of the patients were male (58.3%) and were using smart phones (63.9%). Most of the participants (91.6%) felt reporting adverse drug reaction is important, but only 37.7% thought of reporting the same. A very low percentage of participants (10%) were aware about the PvPI and the helpline number.
conclusionThe Indian health consumer is highly unaware about the existence of the PvPI and various tools available to report adverse drug reactions. It is the need of the hour to create awareness of the same by using the positive attitude toward the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.