ArticleChildren and youth services review2020
Vitamin D Deficiency in a Minnesota-Based Foster Care Population: A Cross Sectional Study.
Article in Children and youth services review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children in foster care have complex health concerns that often interplay with their childhood experiences, environment and access to care. Studies suggest that foster care youth are at an increased risk for mental health disorders and physical disabilities. Although traditionally associated with insufficient bone development, the implications of vitamin D deficiency are broadening to encompass behavioral, neurodevelopmental, and psychological phenomena. Due to its association with diet, prenatal factors, and the prevalence of nutrition related deficiencies in foster care patients, we hypothesize that foster care patients exhibit lower levels of total 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] than the general pediatric population. A retrospective cross-sectional chart review of foster care patients and similar-aged non-fostered controls screened for vitamin D deficiency was conducted between January 2013 and May 2018 (n=407). Twenty-five (OH)D levels were comparable between foster care children and controls (p=0.771). A univariate analysis of risk factors within the foster care group found that higher BMI, older age, ADHD, and number of transitions was associated with decreased levels of 25(OH)D. Recognition and treatment of low 25(OH)D in foster care patients with specific risk factors may serve as an adjunct for meeting their medical and psychosocial needs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.