Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162629›Full record

ArticleChildren and youth services review2020

Parental attendance in two early-childhood training programmes to improve nurturing care: A randomized controlled trial.

Rafaela Costa Martins, Adriana Kramer Fiala Machado, Yulia Shenderovich, Tâmara Biolo Soares, Suélen Henriques da Cruz, Elisa Raquel Pisani Altafim, Maria Beatriz Martins Linhares, Fernando Barros, Iná S Santos, Joseph Murray

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children and youth services review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of Two Early Parenting Programmes on Child Aggression and Risk for Violence in Brazil: a Randomised Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Future of Parenting Programs: II Implementation.Parenting, science and practice · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafaela Costa MartinsPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Adriana Kramer Fiala MachadoPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Yulia ShenderovichCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, United Kingdom.
Tâmara Biolo SoaresInstituto Cidade Segura, Brazil.
Suélen Henriques da CruzPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Elisa Raquel Pisani AltafimDepartment of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Beatriz Martins LinharesDepartment of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando BarrosPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Iná S SantosPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Joseph MurrayPost-graduate Programme in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BROxford Policy Management · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parent training programmes have significant potential to improve the quality of children's early environments and thereby their development and life-course outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify and explain the extent to which parents engaged in two group-based training programmes, offered to high-risk families enrolled in a randomized controlled trial study called PIÁ in Southern Brazil. The programmes were: (1) ACT: Raising Safe Kids, a 9-week programme aiming to reduce harsh parenting and maltreatment and improve positive parenting practices; (2) Dialogic book-sharing (DBS), an 8-week programme aiming to promote parental sensitivity and improve child cognitive development and social understanding. Of the 123 mothers randomly allocated to the ACT programme, 64.2% (n = 79) completed the course, and of 124 mothers allocated to DBS, 76.6% (n = 95) completed the course. After the interventions, mothers were very positive about the experience of both programmes but highlighted practical difficulties in attending. In adjusted regression analyses, only two variables significantly predicted ACT course completion (maternal age and distance between the intervention site and household); no significant predictor was found for DBS attendance. We conclude that although high completion rates are possible, there are important challenges to engaging parents of young children in training programmes, and practical difficulties occurring during training courses may be more important for attendance than baseline participant characteristics.

Indexed as

BrazilChildEarly interventionEducationalParentingRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33162629
PMCPMC7607382
OpenAlexW3082036959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.