Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162395›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry

Molecular mechanism of selective substrate engagement and inhibitor disengagement of cysteine synthase.

Abhishek Kaushik, R Rahisuddin, Neha Saini, Ravi P Singh, Rajveer Kaur, Sukirte Koul, S Kumaran

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Structure-Functional Examination of Cysteine Synthase A (CysK) fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structural Basis for Allostery in PLP-dependent Enzymes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhishek KaushikG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
R RahisuddinG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
Neha SainiG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
Ravi P SinghG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
Rajveer KaurG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
Sukirte KoulG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India.
S KumaranG. N. Ramachandran Protein Center, Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTECH), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Sector 39-A, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: skumaran@imtech.res.in.
Institute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

O-acetyl serine sulfhydrylase (OASS), referred to as cysteine synthase (CS), synthesizes cysteine from O-acetyl serine (OAS) and sulfur in bacteria and plants. The inherent challenge for CS is to overcome 4 to 6 log-folds stronger affinity for its natural inhibitor, serine acetyltransferase (SAT), as compared with its affinity for substrate, OAS. Our recent study showed that CS employs a novel competitive-allosteric mechanism to selectively recruit its substrate in the presence of natural inhibitor. In this study, we trace the molecular features that control selective substrate recruitment. To generalize our findings, we used CS from three different bacteria (Haemophilus, Salmonella, and Mycobacterium) as our model systems and analyzed structural and substrate-binding features of wild-type CS and its ∼13 mutants. Results show that CS uses a noncatalytic residue, M120, located 20 Å away from the reaction center, to discriminate in favor of substrate. M120A and background mutants display significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding. Results shows that M120 favors the substrate binding by selectively enhancing the affinity for the substrate and disengaging the inhibitor by 20 to 286 and 5- to 3-folds, respectively. Together, M120 confers a net discriminative force in favor of substrate by 100- to 858-folds.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionCatalysisCircular DichroismCrystallography, X-RayCysteine SynthaseEnzyme InhibitorsKineticsMethionineProtein ConformationSubstrate SpecificityCysteine SynthaseEnzyme InhibitorsMethioninecompetitive allosterycysteine synthesisfluorescencesubstrate selectivityX-ray crystallography

Identifiers

PMID33162395
PMCPMC7948407
OpenAlexW3105850251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.