Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162362›Full record

ArticleWomen and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives2021

Differences in levels of stress, social support, health behaviours, and stress-reduction strategies for women pregnant before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and based on phases of pandemic restrictions, in Ireland.

Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Johanna Pope, Avril Cremin, Hayley Carr, Sara Leitao, Ellinor K Olander, Sarah Meaney

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A systematic review of COVID-19's impact on pregnancy outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen Matvienko-SikarSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland. Electronic address: Karen.msikar@ucc.ie.
Johanna PopeSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
Avril CreminSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
Hayley CarrCollege of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
Sara LeitaoNational Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Ireland.
Ellinor K OlanderCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Sarah MeaneyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Ireland.
University College Cork · IECity, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions can adversely impact antenatal maternal well-being and health behaviours.

aimTo examine antenatal stress and stress-reduction strategies, social support, and health behaviours between women pregnant before and during the pandemic in Ireland.

methods210 pregnant women were recruited online and in the antenatal department of a tertiary maternity hospital before the pandemic, and 235 women recruited online during the pandemic. Only women resident in Ireland were included in this study. Women completed measures of stress, social support, health-behaviours, and self-reported stress-reduction strategies. Differences in outcomes were examined between women pregnant before and during the pandemic, and between Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the Irish Government COVID-19 restrictions.

findingsWomen pregnant during the pandemic reported lower perceived social support, including support from a significant other, friends and family, than women pregnant before the pandemic. There were no significant differences in stress in health behaviours but women reported higher stress and less physical activity during the pandemic. Women reported a range of comparable stress-reduction strategies before and during the pandemic. No differences were observed between phases of pandemic-related restrictions for any outcome. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight negative impacts of the pandemic on social support, stress, and physical activity, which can have implications for maternal and child health. Lack of differences between restriction phases suggests on-going negative effects for antenatal well-being and behaviours.

conclusionDevelopment of supports for pregnant women during the pandemic should include social-support and stress-reduction components.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsChildFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansIrelandPregnancyPregnant PeopleSARS-CoV-2Social SupportStress, PsychologicalCOVID-19Health behavioursPregnancySocial supportStress

Identifiers

PMID33162362
PMCPMC7584422
OpenAlexW3094575829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.