Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33162118›Full record

ReviewRevista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion2021

A moment for reflection. Ethical aspects in the pandemic SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 in our clinical practice.

M J Yepes-Temiño, R Callejas González, J M Álvarez Avello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lessons from COVID-19 for future disasters: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  2. [COVID-19: Ethics and human rights in clinical practice].Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M J Yepes-TemiñoClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España. Electronic address: mjyepes@unav.es.
R Callejas GonzálezClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, España.
J M Álvarez AvelloClínica Universidad de Navarra campus Madrid, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The entire world has suffered the devastating action of the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic. This is the ideal moment to stop and ask ourselves what happened and how we acted; to reflect on what we have learned not only for similar situations but for all of our clinical practice. This work is an ethical reflection via the clinical experience of professionals dedicated to the care of critical patients in one of the countries most affected by the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic in the world. Some of the moral values and categories involved in decision-making in situations of limited resources are analysed, and the need for bioethics to be a part of daily practice is proposed, along with some strategies for doing so, thus facilitating decision-making by the health professional and fair and appropriate care for the patient in situations of particular vulnerability such as those experienced in this health and social crisis.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth ResourcesHumansCribadoCritical patientEthicsÉticaPaciente críticoPandemiaPandemicSARS-CoV-2/COVID-19Screening

Identifiers

PMID33162118
PMCPMC7644426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.