Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33161825›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Sex Differences in the Age of Diagnosis for Cardiovascular Disease and Its Risk Factors Among US Adults: Trends From 2008 to 2017, the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Victor Okunrintemi, Martin Tibuakuu, Salim S Virani, Laurence S Sperling, Annabelle Santos Volgman, Martha Gulati, Leslie Cho, Thorsten M Leucker, Roger S Blumenthal, Erin D Michos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Early atherogenesis: In search of etiology.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Lactation and cardiovascular health: A comprehensive review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Trends in kidney stone prevalence among U.S. adults A concerning contemporary gender analysis from the NHANES database.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victor OkunrintemiDepartment of Internal Medicine East Carolina University Greenville NC.
Martin TibuakuuCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.
Salim S ViraniDivision of Cardiology Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX.
Laurence S SperlingDivision of Cardiology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.
Annabelle Santos VolgmanSection of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Rush University Chicago IL.
Martha GulatiDivision of Cardiology University of Arizona School of Medicine Phoenix AZ.
Leslie ChoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH.
Thorsten M LeuckerCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.
Roger S BlumenthalCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.
Erin D MichosCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Johns Hopkins University Baltimore MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Sex differences in the trends for control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors have been described, but temporal trends in the age at which CVD and its risk factors are diagnosed and sex-specific differences in these trends are unknown. Methods and Results We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2008 to 2017, a nationally representative sample of the US population. Individuals ≥18 years, with a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, coronary heart disease, or stroke, and who reported the age when these conditions were diagnosed, were included. We included 100 709 participants (50.2% women), representing 91.9 million US adults with above conditions. For coronary heart disease and hypercholesterolemia, mean age at diagnosis was 1.06 and 0.92 years older for women, compared with men, respectively (both

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAttitude to HealthCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseFemaleHealth ExpendituresHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHypercholesterolemiaHypertensionIncidenceMaleMiddle Agedage of diagnosiscardiovascular diseaserisk factorssex differences

Identifiers

PMID33161825
PMCPMC7955360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.