Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33161584›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2021

A 12-Week, Prospective, Non-Comparative, Non-Randomized Study of Magnetic Muscle Stimulation for Improvement of Body Satisfaction With the Abdomen and Buttocks.

Sabrina Fabi, Jeffrey S Dover, Elizabeth Tanzi, Leyda E Bowes, Felicia Tsai Fu, Abi Odusan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03983304 (Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation for Abdominal and Gluteal Muscle Toning), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03983304 nacompletednot on this map

Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation for Abdominal and Gluteal Muscle Toning

TypeinterventionalSponsorZeltiq AestheticsRan2019 to 2020Enrolled110ConditionsNon-Therapeutic Body ModificationArmsThe ZELTIQ EMS System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrina FabiCosmetic Laser Dermatology, San Diego, California, 92121.
Jeffrey S DoverSkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467.
Elizabeth TanziCapital Laser and Skin Care, Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815.
Leyda E BowesBowes Dermatology Group, Miami, Florida, 33133.
Felicia Tsai FuAbbVie Inc, Irvine, California, 92612.
Abi OdusanAbbVie Inc, Irvine, California, 92612.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveMagnetic muscle stimulation (MMS) is a relatively new energy-based technology that provides a non-invasive option for body contouring through stimulation and toning of underlying skeletal muscles. This study was conducted to examine the safety, efficacy, and body satisfaction scores of MMS using a CoolToneTM prototype for the aesthetic improvement of abdominal and buttock contour. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a prospective, non-comparative, non-randomized, 12-week, multicenter study. Male and female participants aged 22-65 years received 4 MMS treatment sessions to the abdomen and/or buttocks. Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) scores for abdomen and/or buttocks were assessed at baseline, immediately post final treatment, at 4 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Subject-rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) was assessed at 4 weeks post final treatment (secondary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Additional efficacy assessment included abdominal circumference obtained by 3D imaging at baseline, immediately post final treatment, and at 4 and 12 weeks post final treatment. A Subject Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) was used to assess treatment satisfaction and perspectives at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post final treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study.

resultsA total of 110 participants were recruited, who were 75% female, 80% Caucasian (mostly non-Hispanic), average age of 39.5 years (range 22-59) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 23.3 kg/m2 (range 18-29.9). At the 4-week post final treatment visit, the average BSQ score for participants receiving abdominal treatment (n = 93) was significantly improved with a 5.1 average increase in total score from baseline (possible score range 10-50) and by a 5.5 average increase from baseline for participants receiving buttocks treatment (n = 32) (p < 0.05). At 4 weeks post final treatment, the proportion of participants with SGAIS scores >"Improved" was 68.1% for participants receiving treatment of the abdomen (n = 94), and 81.8% for those receiving buttocks treatment (n = 33). The mean total decrease from baseline in waist circumference was significant at all time points. At the 12-week post final treatment visit, SEQ data revealed that a majority of participants were "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" with overall treatment results and "Agreed" or "Strongly Agreed" that they were motivated to maintain results either by working out or by additional treatment. A total of 6 AEs related to the device and/or treatment were reported, which resolved spontaneously during the study.

conclusionTreatment of the abdomen and/or buttocks with MMS was well-tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in aesthetic appearance through the 12-week post final treatment study duration. As a stand-alone treatment, MMS expands the range of options for individualized treatment planning for patients seeking abdominal and/or gluteal muscle toning. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAbdomenAdultButtocksFemaleHumansMagnetic PhenomenaMaleMiddle AgedMusclesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGluteal muscle toningMagnetic muscle stimulationMMS, Abdominal muscle toningNon-invasive body contouring

Identifiers

PMID33161584
PMCPMC7894278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.