ReviewPulmonary therapy2021
Air Pollution and Asthma: Critical Targets for Effective Action.
Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Piloting co-developed behaviour change interventions to reduce exposure to air pollution and improve self-reported asthma-related health.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Trial
- Improving Care for People with Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Taking a Policy Lens.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Complex interplays: Asthma management and maternal‑fetal outcomes in pregnancy (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Review
- Effect of VAChT reduction on lung alterations induced by exposure to iron particles in an asthma model.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2024Article
- Evaluating low-cost monitoring designs for PMEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024Article
- Immune-mediated disease caused by climate change-associated environmental hazards: mitigation and adaptation.Frontiers in science · 2024Article
- Interventions to reduce the impact of outdoor air pollution on asthma: A systematic review.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2024Review
- Financing Costs and Health Effects of Air Pollution in the Tri-City Agglomeration.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Metabolomic Study of Heterotrophically GrownMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence to advocate for cleaner air for people with asthma is not in short supply. We know that air pollution is associated with the development and worsening of the condition and that mitigating interventions can improve respiratory outcomes. We have clear targets, particularly traffic emissions, especially in urban areas, and plenty of potentially effective actions. Road traffic must be reduced, and what remains should be cleaner and greener. Urban green spaces, safe cycle networks and wider pavements will promote active travel and leisure time exercise. Healthcare professionals must ensure people are aware of their air quality, its impact on asthma and the appropriate behaviour to safeguard health. What remains are realistic policies and effective measures, based on the correct scientific evidence, to be taken forth with political courage and investment so that air pollution no longer contributes to the development or worsening of respiratory ill health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.