ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021
Cross-sectional validation of the PROMIS-Preference scoring system by its association with social determinants of health.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interlaminar versus sublaminar lumbar decompression: a retrospective study on patient satisfaction as measured by PROMIS outcomes.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Reducing sleep medication via parallel delivery of clinical pharmacist-led deprescribing and clinician-supervised asynchronous CBT for insomnia: the SEDATIVE trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Race, Ethnicity, and Gender Differences in Patient Reported Well-Being and Cognitive Functioning Within 3 Months of Symptomatic Illness During COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Agreement of PROMIS Preference (PROPr) scores generated from the PROMIS-29 + 2 and the PROMIS-16.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Characteristics of hospital and health system initiatives to address social determinants of health in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and PROPr in patients with spinal muscular atrophy.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Understanding the measurement relationship between EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-29 and PROPr.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Cumulative social disadvantage and health-related quality of life: national health interview survey 2013-2017.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Health-related quality of life and social determinants of health following COVID-19 infection in a predominantly Latino population.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- A Comparison of PROPr and EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Evidence on the relationship between PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D: a literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Review
- Measuring population health: association of self-rated health and PROMIS measures with social determinants of health in a cross-sectional survey of the US population.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposePROMIS-Preference (PROPr) is a generic, societal, preference-based summary score that uses seven domains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). This report evaluates construct validity of PROPr by its association with social determinants of health (SDoH).
methodsAn online panel survey of the US adult population included PROPr, SDoH, demographics, chronic conditions, and four other scores: the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), Health Utilities Index (HUI) Mark 2 and Mark 3, and the Short Form-6D (SF-6D). Each score was regressed on age, gender, health conditions, and a single SDoH. The SDoH coefficient represents the strength of its association to PROPr and was used to assess known-groups validity. Convergent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlations between different summary scores and Spearman correlations between SDoH coefficients from different summary scores.
resultsFrom 4142 participants, all summary scores had statistically significant differences for variables related to education, income, food and financial insecurity, and social interactions. Of the 42 SDoH variables tested, the number of statistically significant variables was 27 for EQ-5D-5L, 17 for HUI Mark 2, 23 for HUI Mark 3, 27 for PROPr, and 27 for SF-6D. The average SDoH coefficients were - 0.086 for EQ-5D-5L, - 0.039 for HUI Mark 2, - 0.063 for HUI Mark 3, - 0.064 for PROPr, and - 0.037 for SF-6D. Despite the difference in magnitude across the measures, Pearson correlations were 0.60 to 0.76 and Spearman correlations were 0.74 to 0.87.
conclusionsThese results provide evidence of construct validity supporting the use of PROPr monitor population health in the general US population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.