Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33161450›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2020

Reduction of pin tract infections during external fixation using cadexomer iodine.

Mylène P Jansen, Nienke van Egmond, Esmee C Kester, Simon C Mastbergen, Floris P J G Lafeber, Roel J H Custers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. In-vitro external fixation pin-site model proof of concept: A novel approach to studying wound healing in transcutaneous implants.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ankle joint distraction is a promising alternative treatment for patients with severe haemophilic ankle arthropathy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mylène P JansenDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 (G02.228), 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. m.p.jansen-36@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1929-6350
Nienke van EgmondDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esmee C KesterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simon C MastbergenDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 (G02.228), 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floris P J G LafeberDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100 (G02.228), 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roel J H CustersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnee joint distraction (KJD) is a joint-preserving treatment for younger osteoarthritis patients. KJD has shown positive results in regular care, but the external fixation frame often caused pin tract skin infections. Therefore, the use of cadexomer iodine was included in the wound care protocol. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate whether use of this ointment reduced the number of patients with infections during KJD treatment.

methodsPatients treated with KJD in regular care were included if they gave consent for use of their data and completed treatment with the newest distraction device before 2020. All patients followed a wound care protocol, which since March 2019 included using cadexomer iodine ointment. The number of patients experiencing pin tract infections was compared between patients who did (March 2019-December 2019) and did not (November 2017-March 2019) use the ointment.

resultsSixty-seven patients were included; 34 patients used cadexomer iodine and 33 patients did not. Patient who did not use cadexomer iodine experienced twice as many infections (64% vs 32%;p = 0.010). There was a significant difference in the number of patients with serious infections, requiring more antibiotics than the standard 7-day oral antibiotics (30% without vs 6% with cadexomer iodine; p = 0.009).

conclusionsThe use of cadexomer iodine ointment during KJD results in a significant reduction of the number of patients experiencing pin tract infections during treatment. Use of this ointment should be considered standard protocol during KJD treatment and could be of value in general external fixator usage as well.

Indexed as

Cadexomer iodineExternal fixationInfectionJoint distractionOintmentPin trackPin tractPreventionRegular care

Identifiers

PMID33161450
PMCPMC7648776
OpenAlexW3095386079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.