Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33161226›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2020

Challenges and achievements of liquid biopsy technologies employed in early breast cancer.

Alfonso Alba-Bernal, Rocío Lavado-Valenzuela, María Emilia Domínguez-Recio, Begoña Jiménez-Rodriguez, María Isabel Queipo-Ortuño, Emilio Alba, Iñaki Comino-Méndez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alfonso Alba-BernalUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain.
Rocío Lavado-ValenzuelaUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain.
María Emilia Domínguez-RecioUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain.
Begoña Jiménez-RodriguezUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain.
María Isabel Queipo-OrtuñoUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain.
Emilio AlbaUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain. Electronic address: ealbac@uma.es.
Iñaki Comino-MéndezUnidad de Gestión Clínica Intercentros de Oncología Medica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria. The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA-CIMES-UMA), Málaga 29010, Spain. Electronic address: inaki.comino@ibima.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer type in women worldwide and its early detection is crucial to curing the disease. Tissue biopsy, currently the method of choice to obtain tumour molecular information, is invasive and might be affected by tumour heterogeneity rendering it incapable to portray the complete molecular picture. Liquid biopsy permits to study disease features in a more comprehensive manner by sampling biofluids and extracting tumour components such as circulating-tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating-tumour cells (CTCs), and/or circulating-tumour RNA (ctRNA) amongst others in a monitoring-compatible manner. In this review, we describe the recent progress in the utilization of the circulating tumour components using early breast cancer samples. We review the most important analytes and technologies employed for their study.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAClinical Decision-MakingDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNACirculating-tumour cellsCirculating-tumour DNACirculating-tumour RNALiquid biopsyLocalized breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID33161226
PMCPMC7670097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.