Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33160719›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of emergency medicine2021

Intravenous Haloperidol Versus Ondansetron for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome (HaVOC): A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Aaron J Ruberto, Marco L A Sivilotti, Savannah Forrester, Andrew K Hall, Frances M Crawford, Andrew G Day

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05244460 (Droperidol on Prevention of Emesis From Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05244460 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Droperidol on Prevention of Emesis From Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMercy Health OhioRan2021 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsCannabis Hyperemesis SyndromeArmsDroperidol Injectable Product, Diphenhydramine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review on Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome and Its Management Options.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome in Youth: Clinical Insights and Public Health Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron J RubertoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Marco L A SivilottiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: marco.sivilotti@queensu.ca.
Savannah ForresterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew K HallDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Frances M CrawfordDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew G DayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveLittle is known about the cause or optimal treatment of hyperemesis in habitual cannabis users. Anecdotal evidence supports the use of haloperidol over traditional antiemetics for this newly recognized disorder. We compare haloperidol with ondansetron for cannabis hyperemesis syndrome.

methodsWe randomized cannabis users with active emesis to either haloperidol (with a nested randomization to either 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg) or ondansetron 8 mg intravenously in a triple-blind fashion. The primary outcome was the reduction from baseline in abdominal pain and nausea (each measured on a 10-cm visual analog scale) at 2 hours after treatment. Although the trial allowed for crossover, the primary analysis used only the first treatment period because few subjects crossed over.

resultsWe enrolled 33 subjects, of whom 30 (16 men, aged 29 years [SD 11 years] using 1.5 g/day [SD 0.9 g/day] since age 19 years [SD 2 years]) received at least 1 treatment (haloperidol 13, ondansetron 17). Haloperidol at either dose was superior to ondansetron (difference 2.3 cm [95% confidence interval 0.6 to 4.0 cm]; P=.01), with similar improvements in both pain and nausea, as well as less use of rescue antiemetics (31% versus 59%; difference -28% [95% confidence interval -61% to 13%]) and shorter time to emergency department (ED) departure (3.1 hours [SD 1.7] versus 5.6 hours [SD 4.5]; difference 2.5 hours [95% confidence interval 0.1 to 5.0 hours]; P=.03). There were 2 return visits for acute dystonia, both in the higher-dose haloperidol group.

conclusionIn this clinical trial, haloperidol was superior to ondansetron for the acute treatment of cannabis-associated hyperemesis. The efficacy of haloperidol over ondansetron provides insight into the pathophysiology of this now common diagnosis in many EDs.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAntiemeticsFemaleHaloperidolHumansMaleMarijuana AbuseOndansetronPain MeasurementSyndromeVomitingAntiemeticsHaloperidolOndansetron

Identifiers

PMID33160719
OpenAlexW3095074983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.