Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33160407›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Significant reduction in abundance of peridomestic mosquitoes (Culicidae) and Culicoides midges (Ceratopogonidae) after chemical intervention in western São Paulo, Brazil.

Mikel A González, Erin Dilger, María M Ronderos, Gustavo R Spinelli, Orin Courtenay, James G C Hamilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Overview of the Management of Mansonellosis.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mikel A González *Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YG, Lancashire, UK.
Erin Dilger *Zeeman Institute and School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
María M RonderosDivisión Entomología, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gustavo R SpinelliDivisión Entomología, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque s/n, 1900, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Orin CourtenayZeeman Institute and School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
James G C HamiltonDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, LA1 4YG, Lancashire, UK. j.g.hamilton@lancaster.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-8516
Universidad Nacional de La Plata · ARUniversity of Warwick · GBEuskadiko Parke Teknologikoa · ESLancaster University · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 080961/Z/06/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed the impact of two sand fly insecticide interventions (insecticide spraying and insecticide-impregnated dog collars) on the peridomestic abundance and distribution of mosquitoes (Culicidae) and biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) in western São Paulo (Brazil) in a long-term (42-month) evaluation. Both of these dipteran groups are vectors of diseases of medical and veterinary relevance to humans and domestic animals in Brazil.

methodsThe interventions in the 3-arm stratified randomised control trial were: pheromone + insecticide (PI) (chicken roosts were sprayed with microencapsulated lambda-cyhalothrin; pheromone lure has no effect on the Diptera pests studied here); dog-collars (DC) (dogs fitted with deltamethrin-impregnated collars); and control (C) (unexposed to pyrethroids) were extended by 12 months. During that time, adult mosquitoes and midges were sampled along 280 households at three household locations (inside human dwellings, dog sleeping sites and chicken roosts).

resultsWe collected 3145 culicids (9 genera, 87.6% Culex spp.) distributed relatively uniformly across all 3 arms: 41.9% at chicken roosts; 37.7% inside houses; and 20.3% at dog sleeping sites. We collected 11,464 Culicoides (15 species) found mostly at chicken roosting sites (84.7%) compared with dog sleeping sites (12.9%) or houses (2.4%). Mosquitoes and Culicoides were most abundant during the hot and rainy season. Increased daytime temperature was marginally associated with increased mosquito abundance (Z = 1.97, P = 0.049) and Culicoides abundance (Z = 1.71, P = 0.087). There was no significant association with daily average rainfall for either group. Household-level mosquito and midge numbers were both significantly reduced by the PI intervention 56% [incidence rate ratio, IRR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.30-0.97), P ≤ 0.05] and 53% [IRR = 0.47 (95% CI: 0.26-0.85), P ≤ 0.05], respectively, compared to the control intervention. The abundance of both dipteran groups at dog sleeping sites was largely unaffected by the PI and DC interventions. The PI intervention significantly reduced abundance of mosquitoes inside houses (41%) and at chicken roosting sites (48%) and reduced midge abundance by 51% in chicken roosting sites.

conclusionsSprayed insecticide at chicken roosting sites reduced the abundance of mosquitoes and midges at the peridomestic level while dog collars had no effect on numbers for any group.

Indexed as

Insect ControlAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBrazilCeratopogonidaeCulicidaeDogsEnvironmentFemaleHumansInsecticidesMaleMosquito VectorsRandom AllocationSeasonsInsecticidesAbundanceBrazilChickensCulicidaeCulicoidesDistributionInsecticide interventionLambda-cyhalothrinSpecies composition

Identifiers

PMID33160407
PMCPMC7648319
OpenAlexW3095965624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.