ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021
Modeling cancer clinical trials using HL7 FHIR to support downstream applications: A case study with colorectal cancer data.
Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- FHIR Standard-Based Oncology Data Model for Cancer Screening: Design and Implementation Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- State-of-the-Art Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)-Based Data Model and Structure Implementations: Systematic Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collected Via Web Applications and Mobile Apps Into a Nation-Wide COVID-19 Research Platform Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Development Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Designing Interoperable Health Care Services Based on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Literature Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Review
- Evaluating automated electronic case report form data entry from electronic health records.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) for Interoperability in Health Research: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- HL7 FHIR with SNOMED-CT to Achieve Semantic and Structural Interoperability in Personal Health Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- CASIDE: A data model for interoperable cancer survivorship information based on FHIR.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveIdentification and Standardization of data elements used in clinical trials may control and reduce the cost and errors during the operational process, and enable seamless data exchange between the electronic data capture (EDC) systems and Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This study presents a methodology to comprehensively capture the clinical trial data element needs. MATERIALS AND
methodsCase report forms (CRF) for clinical trial data collection were used to approximate the clinical information need, whereby these information needs were then mapped to a semantically equivalent field within an existing FHIR cancer profile. For items without a semantically equivalent field, we considered these items to be information needs that cannot be represented in current standards and proposed extensions to support these needs.
resultsWe successfully identified 62 discrete items from a preliminary survey of 43 base questions in four CRFs used in colorectal cancer clinical trials, in which 28 items are modeled with FHIR extensions and their associated responses for colorectal cancer. We achieved promising results in the data population of the CRFs with average Precision 98.5 %, Recall 96.2 %, and F-measure 96.8 % for all base questions. We also demonstrated the auto-filled answers in CRFs can be used to discover patient subgroups using a topic modeling approach.
conclusionCRFs can be considered as a proxy for representing information needs for their respective cancer types. Mining the information needs can serve as a valuable resource for expanding existing standards to ensure they can comprehensively represent relevant clinical data without loss of granularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.