Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33160272›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2021

Modeling cancer clinical trials using HL7 FHIR to support downstream applications: A case study with colorectal cancer data.

Nansu Zong, Daniel J Stone, Deepak K Sharma, Andrew Wen, Chen Wang, Yue Yu, Ming Huang, Sijia Liu, Hongfang Liu, Qian Shi and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. HL7 FHIR-based tools and initiatives to support clinical research: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nansu ZongDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Daniel J StoneDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Deepak K SharmaDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Andrew WenDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Chen WangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yue YuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ming HuangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sijia LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Qian ShiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Guoqian JiangDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Jiang.Guoqian@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Tools for standardizing clinical research metadata using HL7 FHIRU01HG009450 · NHGRI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, GUOQIAN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsR00GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2021 to 2023
$747k
BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsK99GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2020 to 2021
$108k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009450NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM135488NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveIdentification and Standardization of data elements used in clinical trials may control and reduce the cost and errors during the operational process, and enable seamless data exchange between the electronic data capture (EDC) systems and Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This study presents a methodology to comprehensively capture the clinical trial data element needs. MATERIALS AND

methodsCase report forms (CRF) for clinical trial data collection were used to approximate the clinical information need, whereby these information needs were then mapped to a semantically equivalent field within an existing FHIR cancer profile. For items without a semantically equivalent field, we considered these items to be information needs that cannot be represented in current standards and proposed extensions to support these needs.

resultsWe successfully identified 62 discrete items from a preliminary survey of 43 base questions in four CRFs used in colorectal cancer clinical trials, in which 28 items are modeled with FHIR extensions and their associated responses for colorectal cancer. We achieved promising results in the data population of the CRFs with average Precision 98.5 %, Recall 96.2 %, and F-measure 96.8 % for all base questions. We also demonstrated the auto-filled answers in CRFs can be used to discover patient subgroups using a topic modeling approach.

conclusionCRFs can be considered as a proxy for representing information needs for their respective cancer types. Mining the information needs can serve as a valuable resource for expanding existing standards to ensure they can comprehensively represent relevant clinical data without loss of granularity.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsClinical Trials as TopicHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCase report formsClinical trialsColorectal cancerHL7 FHIRPatient subgrouping

Identifiers

PMID33160272
PMCPMC7736510
OpenAlexW3093979768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.