ArticleFolia microbiologica2021
Rapid and sensitive identification of pleural and peritoneal infections by droplet digital PCR.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation of droplet digital pcr for suspected ascites infection in patients with liver cirrhosis.Hepatology international · 2024Article
- Droplet digital PCR aids in the diagnosis of children with fever of unknown origin --A typical case report.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of poly-microorganisms detected by droplet digital PCR and pathogen load kinetics in sepsis patients: a multi-center prospective cohort study.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a multiplex-qPCR for paediatric pleural empyema-An observational study in hospitalised children.PloS one · 2024Observational
- Reliability of Droplet Digital PCR Alone and in Combination with Interleukin-6 and Procalcitonin for Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection.Infection and drug resistance · 2024Article
- Analytical and clinical validation of multiplex droplet digital PCR assay for detecting pathogenic fungal infection in lungs.Mycology · 2024Article
- Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Suspected Bloodstream Infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Evaluation of droplet digital PCR rapid detection method and precise diagnosis and treatment for suspected sepsis (PROGRESS): a study protocol for a multi-center pragmatic randomized controlled trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Digital PCR applications for the diagnosis and management of infection in critical care medicine.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Review
- Recent Insights into the Management of Pleural Infection.International journal of general medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pleural and peritoneal infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on the cultivation of clinical samples, which usually takes days to obtain report and holds a low detection sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated a 5-fluorescent-channel droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system and 5 assay panels for culture-independent rapid pathogen detections directly from pleural and peritoneal fluid samples. Traditional culture of the same sample was used as reference. A total of 40 pleural fluid samples and 19 peritoneal fluid samples were tested in this study. Twenty-five positives including 4 polymicrobial infections by culture and 26 positives including 11 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for pleural fluid samples; 14 positives including 2 polymicrobial infections by culture and 15 positives including 3 polymicrobial infections by ddPCR were detected for peritoneal fluid samples. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common bacterium detected both in pleural and in peritoneal fluid samples. The sensitivity of the ddPCR assay for pleural and peritoneal fluid samples was 96% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 79.65 to 99.90%) and 92.86% (95% CI = 66.13 to 99.82%), respectively. The turnaround time of the ddPCR assay was approximately 3 h comparing with 38.30 ± 22.44 h for culture-based identifications. Our results demonstrated that the ddPCR assay is a rapid and sensitive method for identifying pathogens responsible for pleural and peritoneal infections and would be a promising approach for early diagnosis and optimizing treatment of infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.