Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159585›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2021

Acute, reproductive, and developmental toxicity of essential oils assessed with alternative in vitro and in vivo systems.

Peter Lanzerstorfer, Georg Sandner, Johannes Pitsch, Bianca Mascher, Tobias Aumiller, Julian Weghuber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Integrative Toxicology Profiling ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Toxicity and safety of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis): a comprehensive review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Hydroxypropyl Cellulose Hydrogel ContainingGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New Weapons to Fight againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Lanzerstorfer *Center of Excellence Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600, Wels, Austria. peter.lanzerstorfer@fh-wels.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-7964
Georg Sandner *Center of Excellence Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Johannes PitschCenter of Excellence Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600, Wels, Austria.
Bianca MascherAustrian Competence Centre for Feed and Food Quality, Safety and Innovation, Head Office: FFoQSI GmbH, Technopark 1C, 3430, Tulln, Austria.
Tobias AumillerDelacon Biotechnik GmbH, Langwiesen 24, 4209, Engerwitzdorf, Austria.
Julian WeghuberCenter of Excellence Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstraße 23, 4600, Wels, Austria. julian.weghuber@fh-wels.at.
University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria · ATAgency for Quality Assurance and Accreditation Austria · AT

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Essential oils (EOs) have attracted increased interest for different applications such as food preservatives, feed additives and ingredients in cosmetics. Due to their reported variable composition of components, they might be acutely toxic to humans and animals in small amounts. Despite the necessity, rigorous toxicity testing in terms of safety evaluation has not been reported so far, especially using alternatives to animal models. Here, we provide a strategy by use of alternative in vitro (cell cultures) and in vivo (Caenorhabditis elegans, hen's egg test) approaches for detailed investigation of the impact of commonly used rosemary, citrus and eucalyptus essential oil on acute, developmental and reproductive toxicity as well as on mucous membrane irritation. In general, all EOs under study exhibited a comparable impact on measured parameters, with a slightly increased toxic potential of rosemary oil. In vitro cell culture results indicated a concentration-dependent decrease of cell viability for all EOs, with mean IC

Indexed as

AnimalsCaco-2 CellsCaenorhabditis elegansCell LineCell SurvivalChick EmbryoEmbryonic DevelopmentGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGene Expression RegulationHeLa CellsHumansLethal Dose 50Oils, VolatileReproductionToxicity TestsUp-RegulationOils, VolatileC. elegansEssential oilHET-CAMIn vivoToxicological assessment

Identifiers

PMID33159585
PMCPMC7870616
OpenAlexW3094907862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.