Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159580›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research2021

Regeneration of the flatworm Prosthiostomum siphunculus (Polycladida, Platyhelminthes).

Tamara Schadt, Veronika Prantl, Alexandra L Grosbusch, Philip Bertemes, Bernhard Egger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tamara Schadt *Research Unit Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Veronika Prantl *Research Unit Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexandra L GrosbuschResearch Unit Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Philip BertemesResearch Unit Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard EggerResearch Unit Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Institute of Zoology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. bernhard.egger@uibk.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6353-9458
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fueled by the discovery of head regeneration in triclads (planarians) two and a half centuries ago, flatworms have been the focus of regeneration research. But not all flatworms can regenerate equally well and to obtain a better picture of the characteristics and evolution of regeneration in flatworms other than planarians, the regeneration capacity and stem cell dynamics during regeneration in the flatworm order Polycladida are studied. Here, we show that as long as the brain remained at least partially intact, the polyclad Prosthiostomum siphunculus was able to regenerate submarginal eyes, cerebral eyes, pharynx, intestine and sucker. In the complete absence of the brain only wound closure was observed but no regeneration of missing organs. Amputated parts of the brain could not be regenerated. The overall regeneration capacity of P. siphunculus is a good fit for category III after a recently established system, in which most polyclads are currently classified. Intact animals showed proliferating cells in front of the brain which is an exception compared with most of the other free-living flatworms that have been observed so far. Proliferating cells could be found within the regeneration blastema, similar to all other flatworm taxa except triclads. No proliferation was observed in epidermis and pharynx. In pulse-chase experiments, the chased cells were found in all regenerated tissues and thereby shown to differentiate and migrate to replace the structures lost upon amputation.

Indexed as

PlatyhelminthsRegenerationAnimalsBrainCell ProliferationBlastemaFlatwormPolycladProliferationRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID33159580
PMCPMC7960593
OpenAlexW3094667769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.