ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Vanishing washout of hepatocellular carcinoma according to the presence of hepatic steatosis: diagnostic performance of CT and MRI.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- LI-RADS v2018 versus KLCA-NCC v2022: comparison of probability-based HCC categories.European radiology · 2026Article
- Temporal Differentiation of Nonperipheral Washout Refines Prognostic Stratification in HCC.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
- A deep learning radiopathomic signature predicts recurrence risk of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Occult liver nodules: their detection and characterization with CEUS.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease.European radiology · 2024Article
- Radiological-histopathological discordance in patients transplanted for HCC and its impact on post-transplant outcomes.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- What is the "washout" of hepatocellular carcinoma as observed on the equilibrium phase CT?: consideration based on the concept of extracellular volume fraction.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Assessment of factors affecting washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma on CT.European radiology · 2021Article
- LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm: Diagnostic Performance after Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the presence of washout and the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the presence of hepatic steatosis.
methodsThis retrospective study included 566 patients with chronic liver disease who had undergone hepatic resection for hepatic tumors (482 HCCs and 84 non-HCCs) between January 2016 and June 2018 and had available multiphasic CT and MR images. Patients were allocated in the fatty liver (n = 141) or non-fatty liver (n = 425) group according to the presence of hepatic steatosis, defined as lipid droplets in at least 5% of hepatocytes on pathological examination. The presence of HCC washout and the diagnostic performance of CT and MRI for HCC were compared between the groups.
resultsHCC washout was less frequently seen in the fatty liver group than in the non-fatty liver group on CT (61.5% vs. 88.9%, p < 0.001), whereas it was similarly present on MRI in both groups (77.0% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.565). For diagnosis of HCC, the sensitivity (53.3% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001) and accuracy (53.9% vs. 80.9%, p < 0.001) of CT were lower in the fatty liver group than in the non-fatty liver group. However, for MRI, these values were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05).
conclusionsHepatic steatosis significantly decreased the performance of CT for the diagnosis of HCC, whereas it did not significantly alter the performance of MRI. KEY POINTS: • Unlike MRI, there is vanishing HCC washout on CT caused by the background hepatic steatosis. • The diagnostic performance of CT for the diagnosis of HCC was significantly altered by hepatic steatosis. • The optimal cutoff HU value of the liver parenchyma for the vanishing washout of HCC was < 50 HU on unenhanced CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.