ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021
Prognostic significance of dissecting the nerve plexus around the common hepatic artery in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate the positivity rate of the nerve plexus (NPL) around the common hepatic artery (CHA), as well as the impact of dissecting the NPL-CHA, during surgical resection of pancreatic cancer.
methodsClinicopathological factors, including hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry, were compared between the resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) and borderline resectable PC (BRPC) groups. Moreover, the relationship between the NPL-CHA status and overall survival (OS) was investigated.
resultsIn this study, 136 eligible patients were divided into the RPC (72) and BRPC (64) groups. In the RPC group, all patients were negative for H&E staining and microinvasion, whereas 13 (20%) and five patients (8%) were positive for H&E staining and microinvasion, respectively, in the BRPC group. The median OS times in the NPL-CHA-positive and -negative groups were 29.8 and 60.2 months, respectively (p = 0.088). The multivariate analysis of OS indicated an elevated initial carbohydrate antigen 19-9, lymph node (LN) metastasis, and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), which independently predicted poor outcomes. In the BRPC subgroup, contact with the CHA on preoperative computed tomography (CT) was a high-risk factor for NPL-CHA positivity.
conclusionNPL-CHA positivity was only present in the BRPC group. In the absence of CT evidence of CHA contact, NPL-CHA dissection may not have survival benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33159546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.