ArticleESC heart failure2021
Heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Economic burden of heart failure in Europe: A systematic review of costs and cost-effectiveness.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Primary care Adherence to Heart failure guidelines in post-discharge, evaluation & routine management (PATHFINDER): a randomized controlled trial.ESC heart failure · 2026Trial
- Genetic and epidemiological insights into the role of neutrophil percentage in heart failure risk: a Mendelian randomization and NHANES study.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Article
- Physicians' Perspectives on a Best Practice Alert to Improve Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.Drugs in context · 2025Article
- Trends in Avoidable Hospitalizations for Heart Failure in Switzerland (1998-2018): A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characteristics of the phenotypes in prevalent and incident cases of heart failure in primary care: IBERICAN study.BMC primary care · 2024Observational
- Clinical Heart fAilure Management Program: Changing the practice by partnering primary care and specialists (CHAMP-HF).International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Tumstatin (69-88) alleviates heart failure via attenuating oxidative stress in rats with myocardial infarction.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Comparison of tablet splitting techniques for dosing accuracy of nebivolol tablets: Hand splitting versus tablet cutter and knife.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021Article
- Endocrine Challenges in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- A Single-Central, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial Protocol: A Clinical Effect Evaluation Study on the TCM Comprehensive Intervention Program for Chronic Heart Failure.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Adding a "Notch" to Cardiovascular Disease Therapeutics: A MicroRNA-Based Approach.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsHeart failure is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but little is known on heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care. This study described patients with heart failure treated by general practitioners, with focus on drug prescriptions and especially on the only specific treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, namely sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS AND
resultsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from an electronic medical record database of Swiss general practitioners from 2016 to 2019. Multilevel logistic regression was used to find determinants of sacubitril/valsartan prescription; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. We identified 1288 heart failure patients (48.5% women; age: median 85 years, interquartile range 77-90 years) by means of diagnosis code, representing 0.5% of patients consulting a general practitioner during the observation period. About 73.6% received a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, 67.8% a beta-blocker, 34.6% a calcium channel blocker, 86.1% a diuretic, and 40.1% another cardiac drug. Sacubitril/valsartan was prescribed in 6% predominantly male patients (OR 2.10, CI 1.25-3.84), of younger age (OR 0.59 per increase in 10 years, CI 0.49-0.71), with diabetes mellitus (OR 1.76, CI 1.07-2.90). The recommended starting dose for sacubitril/valsartan was achieved in 67.1% and the target dose in 28.6% of patients.
conclusionsPrevalence of heart failure among patients treated by general practitioners was low. Considering the disease burden and association with multimorbidity, awareness of heart failure in primary care should be increased, with the aim to optimize heart failure therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.