Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159393›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Yael Rachamin, Rahel Meier, Thomas Rosemann, Andreas J Flammer, Corinne Chmiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparison of tablet splitting techniques for dosing accuracy of nebivolol tablets: Hand splitting versus tablet cutter and knife.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yael RachaminInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1484-6934
Rahel MeierInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-9753
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6436-6306
Andreas J FlammerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-0630
Corinne ChmielInstitute of Primary Care, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse 24, Zürich, 8091, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5249-6592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHeart failure is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but little is known on heart failure epidemiology and treatment in primary care. This study described patients with heart failure treated by general practitioners, with focus on drug prescriptions and especially on the only specific treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, namely sacubitril/valsartan. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from an electronic medical record database of Swiss general practitioners from 2016 to 2019. Multilevel logistic regression was used to find determinants of sacubitril/valsartan prescription; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. We identified 1288 heart failure patients (48.5% women; age: median 85 years, interquartile range 77-90 years) by means of diagnosis code, representing 0.5% of patients consulting a general practitioner during the observation period. About 73.6% received a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, 67.8% a beta-blocker, 34.6% a calcium channel blocker, 86.1% a diuretic, and 40.1% another cardiac drug. Sacubitril/valsartan was prescribed in 6% predominantly male patients (OR 2.10, CI 1.25-3.84), of younger age (OR 0.59 per increase in 10 years, CI 0.49-0.71), with diabetes mellitus (OR 1.76, CI 1.07-2.90). The recommended starting dose for sacubitril/valsartan was achieved in 67.1% and the target dose in 28.6% of patients.

conclusionsPrevalence of heart failure among patients treated by general practitioners was low. Considering the disease burden and association with multimorbidity, awareness of heart failure in primary care should be increased, with the aim to optimize heart failure therapy.

Indexed as

Angiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHeart FailureAgedAged, 80 and overChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsDrug treatmentGeneral practitionersHeart failureMonitoringPrimary careSacubitril/valsartan

Identifiers

PMID33159393
PMCPMC7835584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.