Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159350›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2021

Satyrization in Drosophila fruitflies.

Stewart Leigh, Wayne G Rostant, Martin I Taylor, Luke Alphey, Tracey Chapman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Satyrization in Drosophila fruitflies.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stewart LeighSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Wayne G RostantSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Martin I TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Luke AlpheyThe Pirbright Institute, Woking, UK.
Tracey ChapmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2401-8120
University of East Anglia · GBThe Pirbright Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The satyr of Greek mythology was half-man, half-goat, with an animal persona signifying immoderate sexual appetites. In biology, satyrization is the disruption of reproduction in matings between closely related species. Interestingly, its effects are often reciprocally asymmetric, manifesting more strongly in one direction of heterospecific mating than the other. Heterospecific matings are well known to result in female fitness costs due to the production of sterile or inviable hybrid offspring and can also occur due to reduced female sexual receptivity, lowering the likelihood of any subsequent conspecific matings. Here we investigated the costs and mechanisms of satyrization in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup of fruitflies. The results showed that D. simulans females experienced higher fitness costs from a loss of remating opportunities due to significantly reduced post-mating sexual receptivity than did D. melanogaster females, as a result of reciprocal heterospecific matings. Reciprocal tests of the effects of male reproductive accessory gland protein (Acp) injections on female receptivity in pairwise comparisons between D. melanogaster and five other species within the melanogaster species subgroup revealed significant post-mating receptivity asymmetries. This was due to variation in the effects of heterospecific Acps within species with which D. melanogaster can mate, and significant but nonasymmetric Acp effects in species with which it cannot. We conclude that asymmetric satyrization due to post-mating effects of Acps may be common among diverging and hybridising species. The findings are of interest in understanding the evolution of reproductive isolation and species divergence.

Indexed as

Reproductive IsolationSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsDrosophila simulansFemaleMaleDrosophila ProteinsAedesDrosophilahybrid matingsatyrizationseminal fluid proteinsspeciation

Identifiers

PMID33159350
PMCPMC8246970
OpenAlexW3095793843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.