Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159283›Full record

Trial reportInternal and emergency medicine2021

Using gel for difficult mask ventilation on the bearded patients: a simulation-based study.

Saqer M Althunayyan, Abdullah M Mubarak, Raied N Alotaibi, Musab Z Alharthi, Mohammed A Aljanoubi, Sulaiman Alshabanat, Abdulmajeed M Mobrad

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saqer M AlthunayyanDepartment of Accident and Trauma, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. salthunayyan@KSU.EDU.SA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7994-3412
Abdullah M MubarakDepartment of Basic Science, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6920-6272
Raied N AlotaibiDepartment of Basic Science, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3505-7002
Musab Z AlharthiDepartment of Accident and Trauma, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-4691
Mohammed A AljanoubiDepartment of Aviation and Marines, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-5823
Sulaiman AlshabanatRespiratory Care Services, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5251-8096
Abdulmajeed M MobradDepartment of Emergency Medical Services, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-5800
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beard is a well-known cause of difficult mask ventilation due to excessive air leaks. Various techniques have been proposed to overcome this difficulty, such as applying a gel on the mask edge. Our objective was to determine whether the gel technique will improve ventilation and to assess the comfort of the provider. A randomized crossover design was conducted to assess the efficacy of gel in a bearded simulation model. Respiratory therapists (RT) were recruited by convenience sampling to hold the mask using a two-handed technique for a two-minute ventilation session. During the session, the ventilator provided a fixed Tidal Volume (TV) of 550 mL and a respiratory rate of 12 per minute, and the simulated model measured the received volumes. We compared the median TV and number of failed ventilation attempts with or without the gel. The comfort level while using the gel was assessed with constructed questions. We recruited 74 respiratory therapists working in Riyadh city. More than half of the participants had more than 5 years experience. The median tidal volume for standard mask ventilation without the gel was 283 mL [interquartile range (IQR) 224, 327], whereas that with the gel was 467 mL [451, 478], respectively (p < 0.01). The number of successful ventilations was recorded out of 24 breaths during the 2-min ventilation period for each technique; the proportion of successful ventilations increased significantly by 65% (95% CI 51-75%, p < 0.01) with the gel. In addition, only nine participants believed the technique was not comfortable, while the remaining individuals found it comfortable or natural. In our bearded simulation model, applying the gel significantly improved ventilation without negatively affecting comfort. Further studies and education are encouraged in the field of basic airway management.

Indexed as

FaceGelsHairLaryngeal MasksCross-Over StudiesHumansMaleManikinsRespiration, ArtificialSaudi ArabiaGelsAirwayBag valve maskBVMDifficult mask ventilationVentilation

Identifiers

PMID33159283
PMCPMC7646717
OpenAlexW3096880845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.