Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159279›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2021

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses on Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Bayesian Optimization.

Akiyoshi Hizukuri, Ryohei Nakayama, Mayumi Nara, Megumi Suzuki, Kiyoshi Namba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning for differentiating benign from malignant tumors on breast-specific gamma image.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Akiyoshi HizukuriDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Noji-higashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8577,, Japan. hizukuri@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5963-3900
Ryohei NakayamaDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Noji-higashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, 525-8577,, Japan.
Mayumi NaraDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-cho, Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0833,, Japan.
Megumi SuzukiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-cho, Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0833,, Japan.
Kiyoshi NambaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hokuto Hospital, 7-5 Kisen, Inada-cho, Obihiro-shi, Hokkaido, 080-0833,, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a higher sensitivity of early breast cancer than mammography, the specificity is lower. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses on dynamic contrast material-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) by using a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) with Bayesian optimization. Our database consisted of 56 DCE-MRI examinations for 56 patients, each of which contained five sequential phase images. It included 26 benign and 30 malignant masses. In this study, we first determined a baseline DCNN model from well-known DCNN models in terms of classification performance. The optimum architecture of the DCNN model was determined by changing the hyperparameters of the baseline DCNN model such as the number of layers, the filter size, and the number of filters using Bayesian optimization. As the input of the proposed DCNN model, rectangular regions of interest which include an entire mass were selected from each of DCE-MRI images by an experienced radiologist. Three-fold cross validation method was used for training and testing of the proposed DCNN model. The classification accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, and the negative predictive value were 92.9% (52/56), 93.3% (28/30), 92.3% (24/26), 93.3% (28/30), and 92.3% (24/26), respectively. These results were substantially greater than those with the conventional method based on handcrafted features and a classifier. The proposed DCNN model achieved high classification performance and would be useful in differential diagnoses of masses in breast DCE-MRI images as a diagnostic aid.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsBayes TheoremComputersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBayesian optimizationBreast magnetic resonance imagingComputer-aided diagnosisDeep convolutional neural networkMass

Identifiers

PMID33159279
PMCPMC7886934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.