Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159139›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A non-classical route of efficient plant uptake verified with fluorescent nanoparticles and root adhesion forces investigated using AFM.

Sandeep Sharma, Mohd Muddassir, Saraladevi Muthusamy, Pardeep Kumar Vaishnav, Manish Singh, Deepak Sharma, Selvaraju Kanagarajan, Vijayakumar Shanmugam

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Imaging tools for plant nanobiotechnology.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandeep SharmaInstitute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase- 10, Sector- 64, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.
Mohd MuddassirCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Saraladevi MuthusamyApplied Microbiology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pardeep Kumar VaishnavMicroscopy Division, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Manish SinghInstitute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase- 10, Sector- 64, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India.
Deepak SharmaCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Selvaraju KanagarajanDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden. selvaraju.kanagarajan@slu.se.
Vijayakumar ShanmugamInstitute of Nano Science and Technology, Habitat Centre, Phase- 10, Sector- 64, Mohali, Punjab, 160062, India. vijayakumarshanmugham@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical plant uptake is limited to hydrophilic or water-dispersible material. Therefore, in order to test the uptake behaviour of hydrophobic particles, here, we tested the fate of hydrophobic particles (oleylamine coated Cu

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesMicroscopy, Atomic ForceNanoparticlesPlant RootsFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID33159139
PMCPMC7648022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.