ArticleScientific reports2020
Results from an 18 country cross-sectional study examining experiences of nature for people with common mental health disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does nature-based social prescription improve mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Testing nature-based biopsychosocial resilience theory: a research programme protocol.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Article
- Engagement with Nature and the Home Environment: Wellbeing and Proenvironmental Behavior among Irish and Italian University Students during the COVID-19 Emergency.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Visiting nature is associated with lower socioeconomic inequalities in well-being in Wales.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Cross-sectional associations of different types of nature exposure with psychotropic, antihypertensive and asthma medication.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of the Amharic Version of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Measures on Intention to Take Preventive Actions on Noncommunicable Disease.Behavioural neurology · 2023Article
- Nature experience from yards provide an important space for mental health during Covid-19.npj urban sustainability · 2023Article
- Targeted health promotion with guided nature walks or group exercise: a controlled trial in primary care.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Tourism as a Tool in Nature-Based Mental Health: Progress and Prospects Post-Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Nature's contributions in coping with a pandemic in the 21st century: A narrative review of evidence during COVID-19.The Science of the total environment · 2022Review
- Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature.BMC psychology · 2022Article
- Home and nearby nature: Uncovering relational flows between domestic and natural spaces in three countries during COVID-19.Wellbeing, space and society · 2022Article
- Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on human-nature interactions: Pathways, evidence and implications.People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Measuring Nature Contact: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- A Transdisciplinary Approach to Recovering Natural and Cultural Landscape and Place Identification: A Case Study of Can Moritz Spring (Rubí, Spain).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Residential Greenspace and Urban Adolescent Substance Use: Exploring Interactive Effects with Peer Network Health, Sex, and Executive Function.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exposure to natural environments is associated with a lower risk of common mental health disorders (CMDs), such as depression and anxiety, but we know little about nature-related motivations, practices and experiences of those already experiencing CMDs. We used data from an 18-country survey to explore these issues (n = 18,838), taking self-reported doctor-prescribed medication for depression and/or anxiety as an indicator of a CMD (n = 2698, 14%). Intrinsic motivation for visiting nature was high for all, though slightly lower for those with CMDs. Most individuals with a CMD reported visiting nature ≥ once a week. Although perceived social pressure to visit nature was associated with higher visit likelihood, it was also associated with lower intrinsic motivation, lower visit happiness and higher visit anxiety. Individuals with CMDs seem to be using nature for self-management, but 'green prescription' programmes need to be sensitive, and avoid undermining intrinsic motivation and nature-based experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.