Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33159057›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Deep learning-enabled multi-organ segmentation in whole-body mouse scans.

Oliver Schoppe, Chenchen Pan, Javier Coronel, Hongcheng Mai, Zhouyi Rong, Mihail Ivilinov Todorov, Annemarie Müskes, Fernando Navarro, Hongwei Li, Ali Ertürk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Streamlining asymmetry quantification in fetal mouse imaging: A semi-automated pipeline supported by expert guidance.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Imaging technologies in experimental pulmonary fibrosis research: essential tool for enhanced translational relevance.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Oliver SchoppeDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. oliver.schoppe@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-2429
Chenchen PanInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Javier CoronelDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hongcheng MaiInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Zhouyi RongInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4849-1278
Mihail Ivilinov TodorovInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Annemarie MüskesBerlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Fernando NavarroDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Hongwei LiDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ali ErtürkInstitute for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (iTERM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. erturk@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-5100
Bjoern H MenzeDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. bjoern.menze@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4136-5690

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-body imaging of mice is a key source of information for research. Organ segmentation is a prerequisite for quantitative analysis but is a tedious and error-prone task if done manually. Here, we present a deep learning solution called AIMOS that automatically segments major organs (brain, lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, bladder, stomach, intestine) and the skeleton in less than a second, orders of magnitude faster than prior algorithms. AIMOS matches or exceeds the segmentation quality of state-of-the-art approaches and of human experts. We exemplify direct applicability for biomedical research for localizing cancer metastases. Furthermore, we show that expert annotations are subject to human error and bias. As a consequence, we show that at least two independently created annotations are needed to assess model performance. Importantly, AIMOS addresses the issue of human bias by identifying the regions where humans are most likely to disagree, and thereby localizes and quantifies this uncertainty for improved downstream analysis. In summary, AIMOS is a powerful open-source tool to increase scalability, reduce bias, and foster reproducibility in many areas of biomedical research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsAnimal StructuresBrainFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyLiverLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReproducibility of ResultsSpleenWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID33159057
PMCPMC7648799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.