Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33158966›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Spontaneous Network Coupling Enables Efficient Task Performance without Local Task-Induced Activations.

Leslie Allaman, Anaïs Mottaz, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Adrian G Guggisberg

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05732649 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Improving Visual Perception and Visuo-motor Learning With Neurofeedback of Brain Network Interaction.

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2023 to 2025Enrolled65ConditionsHealthyArmsAuditory neurofeedback, Tactile neurofeedback, Auditory and tactile neurofeedback, Neurofeedback
NCT07237412 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Neurofeedback-based Visual Restoration Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAdrian GuggisbergRan2025 to 2028Enrolled14ConditionsVisual Field Defect Homonymous BilateralArmsneurofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Closed-Loop Neurofeedback of α Synchrony during Goal-Directed Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Trial
  4. Encoding Manual Dexterity through Modulation of Intrinsic α Band Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Decoding cognition from spontaneous neural activity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leslie AllamanDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Genève, GE 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2471-8987
Anaïs MottazDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Genève, GE 1211, Switzerland.
Andreas KleinschmidtDivision of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Genève, GE 1205, Switzerland.
Adrian G GuggisbergDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, Genève, GE 1211, Switzerland aguggis@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7178-7793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurobehavioral studies in humans have long concentrated on changes in local activity levels during repetitive executions of a task. Spontaneous neural coupling within extended networks has latterly been found to also influence performance. Here, we intend to uncover the underlying mechanisms, the relative importance, and the interaction between spontaneous coupling and task-induced activations. To do so, we recorded two groups of healthy participants (male and female) during rest and while they performed either a visual perception or a motor sequence task. We demonstrate that, for both tasks, stronger activations during the task as well as greater network coupling through spontaneous α rhythms at rest predict performance. However, high performers present an absence of classical task-induced activations and, instead, stronger spontaneous network coupling. Activations were thus a compensation mechanism needed only in subjects with lower spontaneous network interactions. This challenges classical models of neural processing and calls for new strategies in attempts to train and enhance performance.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceReaction TimeYoung Adultevent-related desynchronizationmotor planningneural couplingvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID33158966
PMCPMC7726528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.