Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33158960›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Yang Hu, Alessandra M Pereira, Xiaoxue Gao, Brunno M Campos, Edmund Derrington, Brice Corgnet, Xiaolin Zhou, Fernando Cendes, Jean-Claude Dreher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yang HuKey Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, People's Republic of China.
Alessandra M PereiraNeuroimaging Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, The Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-970, Brazil.
Xiaoxue GaoSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8901-6137
Brunno M CamposNeuroimaging Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, The Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-970, Brazil.
Edmund DerringtonInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, Neuroeconomics Lab 69675 Bron, France.
Brice CorgnetEmLyon, 69130 Ecully, France.
Xiaolin ZhouKey Laboratory of Applied Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Business and Management, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201620, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-4360
Fernando CendesNeuroimaging Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, The Brazilian Institute of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas 13083-970, Brazil.
Jean-Claude DreherInstitut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS, Neuroeconomics Lab 69675 Bron, France dreher@isc.cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-1529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by a core difference in theory-of-mind (ToM) ability, which extends to alterations in moral judgment and decision-making. Although the function of the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), a key neural marker of ToM and morality, is known to be atypical in autistic individuals, the neurocomputational mechanisms underlying its specific changes in moral decision-making remain unclear. Here, we addressed this question by using a novel fMRI task together with computational modeling and representational similarity analysis (RSA). ASD participants and healthy control subjects (HCs) decided in public or private whether to incur a personal cost for funding a morally good cause (Good Context) or receive a personal gain for benefiting a morally bad cause (Bad Context). Compared with HC, individuals with ASD were much more likely to reject the opportunity to earn ill gotten money by supporting a bad cause than were HCs. Computational modeling revealed that this resulted from heavily weighing benefits for themselves and the bad cause, suggesting that ASD participants apply a rule of refusing to serve a bad cause because they evaluate the negative consequences of their actions more severely. Moreover, RSA revealed a reduced rTPJ representation of the information specific to moral contexts in ASD participants. Together, these findings indicate the contribution of rTPJ in representing information concerning moral rules and provide new insights for the neurobiological basis underpinning moral behaviors illustrated by a specific difference of rTPJ in ASD participants.

Indexed as

MoralsAdolescentAutism Spectrum DisorderBrainComputer SimulationFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTheory of MindYoung Adultautismdecision-makingfMRImoral

Identifiers

PMID33158960
PMCPMC8115877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.