ReviewBMJ global health2020
Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures.
Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Analysis and evolution of health policies in Iran through policy triangle framework during the last thirty years: a systematic review of the historical period from 1994 to 2021.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2023Pooled it
- Implementation of medicines pricing policies in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Mapping stakeholders for developing cancer research in Small Island Developing States: a descriptive study from the Eastern Caribbean.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Cultivating Nurse Leaders: Integrating Policy Analysis Projects in Doctor of Nursing Practice Programmes.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Method for and potential value of reflexive stakeholder mapping of a policy evaluation team: the example of the national evaluation of the NHS Pharmacy First scheme.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Mapping the rare disease stakeholders in India.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Trust, autonomy, and informed consent: a qualitative investigation of youth experiences accessing contraception in Canada.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Perceived motivators and barriers to implementation of a smoke-free common area policy in multiunit housing in urban Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adolescent mental, sexual, and reproductive health in Ghana: a stakeholder analysis of actors' influence over policy formulation and implementation.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Stakeholder analysis for 'One Health' approach to tackle antimicrobial resistance.BMJ global health · 2025Review
- Understanding the political economy of reforming global health initiatives - insights from global and country levels.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- Power dynamics and intersectoral collaboration for health in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Improving the provision for gynaecological health care in Bangladesh using Essential Gynaecological Skills implementation package: a stakeholder-driven approach in public health facilities.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Support for a Weight-Inclusive Curriculum? Exploring Partner Perspectives and Influences on Nutrition Education in Vermont High Schools.The Journal of school health · 2025Article
- Stakeholders' perspectives on the implementation of school hearing screening in Botswana.Journal of public health in Africa · 2025Article
- Stakeholder analysis in urban-planetary health research: The Key Group Approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- "All of these things interact, that's why it's such a wicked problem": Stakeholders' perspectives of what hinders low back pain care in Australia and how to improve it.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Evidence-based practice in traditional persian medicine (TPM): a stakeholder and social network analysis.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolicy is shaped and influenced by a diverse set of stakeholders at the global, national and local levels. While stakeholder analysis is a recognised practical tool to assess the positions and engagement of actors relevant to policy, few empirical studies provide details of how complex concepts such as power, interest and position are operationalised and assessed in these types of analyses. This study aims to address this gap by reviewing conceptual approaches underlying stakeholder analyses and by developing a framework that can be applied to policy implementation in low-and-middle income countries.
methodsThe framework was developed through a three-step process: a scoping review, peer review by health policy experts and the conduct of an analysis using key informant interviews and a consensus building exercise. Four characteristics were selected for inclusion: levels of knowledge, interest, power and position of stakeholders related to the policy.
resultThe framework development process highlighted the need to revisit how we assess the power of actors, a key issue in stakeholder analyses, and differentiate an actor's potential power, based on resources, and whether they exercise it, based on the actions they take for or against a policy. Exploration of the intersections between characteristics of actors and their level of knowledge can determine interest, which in turn can affect stakeholder position on a policy, showing the importance of analysing these characteristics together. Both top-down and bottom-up approaches in implementation must also be incorporated in the analysis of policy actors, as there are differences in the type of knowledge, interest and sources of power among national, local and frontline stakeholders.
conclusionThe developed framework contributes to health policy research by offering a practical tool for analysing the characteristics of policy actors and tackling the intricacies of assessing complex concepts embedded in the conduct of stakeholder analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.