Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33158741›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2021

Disparities in precision medicine-Examining germline genetic counseling and testing patterns among men with prostate cancer.

Hala T Borno, Anobel Y Odisho, Christine M Gunn, Magdalena Pankowska, Jennifer R Rider

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Recommendations for the implementation of genetic testing for metastatic prostate cancer patients in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hala T BornoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: Hala.borno@ucsf.edu.
Anobel Y OdishoDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Center for Digital Health Innovation, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Christine M GunnDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston, MA; Department of Health Law, Boston University School of Public Health, Policy, and Management, Boston, MA.
Magdalena PankowskaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston, MA.
Jennifer R RiderDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Boston University · USCity of Hope · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Using Community-Engaged Methods to Design a Tool to Promote Informed Breast Cancer Screening Decisions for Low Literacy WomenK07CA221899 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GUNN, CHRISTINE MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$642k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA221899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study sought to examine whether germline genetic counseling and testing were employed differentially among men with prostate cancer by race and/or ethnicity and other social factors.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, all patients with prostate cancer listed as a visit diagnosis during the study period (April 2011 to August 2020) were identified from electronic health records. Patient characteristics were collected along with genetic counselor visits and germline genetic testing results in electronic health records. Multivariable analyses were performed with the primary outcome defined as the receipt of a genetic counseling visit and receipt of genetic testing.

resultsA total of 14,610 patients with a prostate cancer diagnosis code were identified. The majority of patients were White (72%), aged >=65 years (62.7%), English-speaking (95%), married (71.4%), and publicly insured (58.7%). A total of 667 patients completed an appointment with a genetic counselor. A total of 439 patients received germline genetic test result, of whom 403 (91.8%) had also completed an appointment with a genetic counselor. Patients that were 65 years or older (adjusted odds ratio 0.53, 95%CI 0.44-0.65) and non-English proficient (adjusted odds ratio 0.71, 95%CI 0.42-1.21) were less likely to receive genetic counseling. Receiving genetic counseling was the strongest independent predictor of receipt of genetic testing.

conclusionsThe results of the current study highlight that the role of social factors in contributing to disparities in genetic counseling and testing among men with prostate cancer. These results underscore the importance of developing novel strategies to tackle contributors of observed disparities including language, age, and insurance status.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingPrecision MedicineAgedAged, 80 and overEthnicityGerm CellsHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostatic NeoplasmsRacial GroupsRetrospective StudiesSocial FactorsCancer disparitiesGermline geneticsProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33158741
PMCPMC9208066
OpenAlexW3095491215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.