Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33158511›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2021

The impact of tumor fragmentation in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma on patterns of recurrence and oncologic outcome.

Silvana Pedra Nobre, Martee L Hensley, Melody So, Qin C Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Mario M Leitao, Jennifer Ducie, Sarah Chiang, Jennifer J Mueller, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A novel morphology-based risk stratification model for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: an analysis of 203 cases.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana Pedra NobreGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Martee L HensleyGynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Melody SoRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, United States of America.
Qin C ZhouEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Alexia IasonosEpidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer DucieDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Ob/Gyn, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Sarah ChiangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jennifer J MuellerGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Oliver ZivanovicGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Joan & Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: zivanovo@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCornell University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TRANSLATIONAL CONTROL IN ADAPTATION TO HYPOXIAP01CA104838 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SIMON, M. CELESTE · 2004 to 2018
$17.6M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA104838NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of tumor fragmentation on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).

methodsWe identified all patients diagnosed with stage I uLMS presenting to our institution within three months of primary surgery, 1/2000-1/2019. Patients with recurrent disease were excluded. The non-morcellated group had total hysterectomy without documented specimen fragmentation; the morcellated group, total hysterectomy with documented specimen fragmentation. We defined fragmentation as manual fragmentation or morcellation (via power morcellator or otherwise) of the specimen in peritoneal cavity or vagina. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed.

results152 patients met inclusion criteria. 107 (70%) underwent total hysterectomy (non-morcellated); 45 (30%) underwent morcellation. Median age at diagnosis for the entire cohort was 55 years (range 30-91). Median follow-up was 42.1 months (range 1.1-197.8). 40 (26.3%) patients had primary surgery at our institution, 112 (73.7%) at an outside hospital. In total 110 (72.3%) recurred: 72/107 (67.2%) non-morcellated; 38/44 (86.3%) morcellated. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for non-morcellated versus morcellated was 13.8 (95%CI 9.2-20.2) versus 7.3 months (95%CI 3-13.1), HR 1.5 (95%CI 1.02-2.24); P = 0.04. Median overall survival (OS) for non-morcellated versus morcellated was 82.1 (95%CI 52.4-122) versus 47.8 months (95%CI 28.5-129.6), HR 1.1 (95%CI 0.67-1.82); P = 0.7. Among patients with recurrence, 69.4% of non-morcellated recurred at hematogenous sites only, 18.1% recurred in peritoneum only; 28.9% of morcellated recurred at hematogenous sites, 63.2% in peritoneum. Race, lymphovascular invasion, postoperative chemotherapy, were independently associated with PFS. Mitotic index was independently associated with OS.

conclusionsTumor fragmentation/morcellation was associated with significantly higher risk of recurrence and a nearly 4-fold increase in peritoneal recurrence. Prognostic biomarkers remain important in predicting oncologic outcomes, independent of fragmentation or treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyLeiomyosarcomaMiddle AgedMorcellationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm SeedingNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesUterine NeoplasmsHysterectomyMorcellationRecurrenceUterine leiomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID33158511
PMCPMC7779751
OpenAlexW3097906973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.