Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33158050›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Tracking and Characterization of Spinal Cord-Injured Patients by Means of RGB-D Sensors.

Filippo Colombo Zefinetti, Andrea Vitali, Daniele Regazzoni, Caterina Rizzi, Guido Molinero

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Smart Sensors for Healthcare and Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo Colombo ZefinettiDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8521-503X
Andrea VitaliDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9261-4357
Daniele RegazzoniDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5533-7047
Caterina RizziDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.
Guido MolineroAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
University of Bergamo · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In physical rehabilitation, motion capture solutions are well-known but not as widespread as they could be. The main limit to their diffusion is not related to cost or usability but to the fact that the data generated when tracking a person must be elaborated according to the specific context and aim. This paper proposes a solution including customized motion capture and data elaboration with the aim of supporting medical personnel in the assessment of spinal cord-injured (SCI) patients using a wheelchair. The configuration of the full-body motion capturing system is based on an asymmetric 3 Microsoft Kinect v2 sensor layout that provides a path of up to 6 m, which is required to properly track the wheelchair. Data elaboration is focused on the automatic recognition of the pushing cycles and on plotting any kinematic parameter that may be interesting in the assessment. Five movements have been considered to evaluate the wheelchair propulsion: the humeral elevation, the horizontal abduction of the humerus, the humeral rotation, the elbow flexion and the trunk extension along the sagittal plane. More than 60 volunteers with a spinal cord injury were enrolled for testing the solution. To evaluate the reliability of the data computed with SCI APPlication (APP) for the pushing cycle analysis, the patients were subdivided in four groups according to the level of the spinal cord injury (i.e., high paraplegia, low paraplegia, C7 tetraplegia and C6 tetraplegia). For each group, the average value and the standard deviation were computed and a comparison with similar acquisitions performed with a high-end solution is shown. The measurements computed by the SCI-APP show a good reliability for analyzing the movements of SCI patients' propulsion wheelchair.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesWheelchairsHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementParaplegiaQuadriplegiaReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cordautomatic pushing analysismarkerless motion captureRGB-D sensorsSCI patients

Identifiers

PMID33158050
PMCPMC7663008
OpenAlexW3094874066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.