Trial reportMedicine2020
Effectiveness of modeling videos on psychological responses of patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A pilot randomized trial.
Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2024Pooled it
- Psychosocial interventions seem redact kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- Kinesiophobia, Knee Self-Efficacy, and Fear Avoidance Beliefs in People with ACL Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions for Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An Examination of the Relationship Between Fear of Reinjury and Neuromuscular, Musculoskeletal, and Biomechanical Characteristics at the Time of Return to Sport following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Association of Quadriceps Muscle Fatigue With Return to Preinjury Sports Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft and Tibialis Anterior Allograft.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of Functional Outcomes between Supervised Rehabilitation and Telerehabilitation in Female Patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Changes in subjective knee function and psychological status from preoperation to 6 months post anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Current study on the influence of psychological factors on returning to sports after ACLR.Heliyon · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo date, much of the rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has centered on physical components. However, clinical outcomes including return to sport after ACLR depends on not only physical recovery but also psychological components. This study was performed to assess the feasibility of 6-month modeling video intervention on psychological responses following ACLR.
methodsFollowing the baseline assessment of psychological measures through Knee Self Efficacy Scale (K-SES), ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11), 32 patients scheduled for ACLR were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 10), placebo (n = 11), or control (n = 11) group. Six modeling videos and placebo videos were developed by the investigators. Intervention and placebo groups watched their respective videos during their follow-up visits while control group did not. All groups completed psychological assessments during hospitalization, at 2 weeks, at 6 weeks, at 3 months, and at 6 months following ACLR. Also, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was used to evaluate symptoms and function of the knee at 3 and 6 months after surgery.
resultsNo significant changes in K-SES, ACL-RSI, and TSK-11 scores over 6-month period were observed among groups (P = .808, P = .574, P = .888, respectively). Compared with baseline, only the scores of K-SES improved with statistical significance in the intervention, placebo, and control groups (P = .05, .01, .00) at 6 months after ACLR. The KOOS subscale scores were not significantly different among the intervention, placebo, and control groups at 3 and 6 months.
conclusionA modeling video intervention, although feasible, was not effective in addressing the psychological risk factors in patients undergoing ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.