Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33157999›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

AML, ALL, and CML classification and diagnosis based on bone marrow cell morphology combined with convolutional neural network: A STARD compliant diagnosis research.

Furong Huang, Peiwen Guang, Fucui Li, Xuewen Liu, Weimin Zhang, Wendong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Artificial intelligence applications in pediatric oncology diagnosis.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Furong HuangDepartment of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Jinan University.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-439
Peiwen GuangDepartment of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Jinan University.
Fucui LiDepartment of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Jinan University.
Xuewen LiuDepartment of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Jinan University.
Weimin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou.
Wendong HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leukemia diagnosis based on bone marrow cell morphology primarily relies on the manual microscopy of bone marrow smears. However, this method is greatly affected by subjective factors and tends to lead to misdiagnosis. This study proposes using bone marrow cell microscopy images and employs convolutional neural network (CNN) combined with transfer learning to establish an objective, rapid, and accurate method for classification and diagnosis of LKA (AML, ALL, and CML). We collected cell microscopy images of 104 bone marrow smears (including 18 healthy subjects, 53 AML patients, 23 ALL patients, and 18 CML patients). The perfect reflection algorithm and a self-adaptive filter algorithm were first used for preprocessing of bone marrow cell images collected from experiments. Subsequently, 3 CNN frameworks (Inception-V3, ResNet50, and DenseNet121) were used to construct classification models for the raw dataset and preprocessed dataset. Transfer learning was used to improve the prediction accuracy of the model. Results showed that the DenseNet121 model based on the preprocessed dataset provided the best classification results, with a prediction accuracy of 74.8%. The prediction accuracy of the DenseNet121 model that was obtained by transfer learning optimization was 95.3%, which was increased by 20.5%. In this model, the prediction accuracies of the normal groups, AML, ALL, and CML were 90%, 99%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. The results showed that the leukemic cell morphology classification and diagnosis based on CNN combined with transfer learning is feasible. Compared with conventional manual microscopy, this method is more rapid, accurate, and objective.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdolescentAdultAgedBone Marrow CellsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33157999
PMCPMC7647529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.