Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33157963›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Clinical observation of the combined use of propofol and etomidate in painless gastroscopy.

Lina Hao, Xibei Hu, Bingqing Zhu, Wanhong Li, Xiang Huang, Fang Kang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05358535 (Propofol and Etomidate Admixtures Comparisons Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05358535 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Propofol and Etomidate Admixtures Comparisons Trial (PEAC Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2022 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsAnesthesia, Propofol Adverse Reaction, Etomidate Adverse Reaction, Anesthesia ComplicationArmsAdmixture of propofol and etomidate at a ratio by volume of 75%/25% (P7E2), Admixture of propofol and etomidate at a ratio by volume of 25%/75% (P2E7)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Dreaming during anaesthesia: a scoping review.British journal of anaesthesia · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

Lina HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, 1st Swan lake road, Shushan District, Hefei, Anhui Province, China.
Xibei Hu
Bingqing Zhu
Wanhong Li
Xiang Huang
University of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study is aims to compare the anesthetic safety of propofol combined with etomidate for painless gastroscopy.

methodsThree hundred patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were randomly assigned to P, PE1, and PE2 groups. Patients were anesthetized with propofol (P group) or propofol combined with etomidate (volume ratio 1: 1, PE1 group; volume ratio 2: 1, PE2 group). The hemodynamics and adverse reactions were observed. The sleep quality satisfaction and nature of dreams were recorded.

resultsCompared with pre-anesthesia, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate of the 3 groups were significantly slower during the examination and at the end of the examination. PE1 group had a higher incidence of muscle spasm, body moving, choking, and deglutition. The incidence of hypoxemia and injection pain was higher in P group. P and PE2 group had higher sleep quality satisfaction and dream incidence after awaking. However, there was no difference in the nature of dreams among 3 groups.

conclusionOur data indicate that the combination of 10 ml 1.0% propofol and 5 ml 0.2% etomidate for painless gastroscopy reduces adverse reactions while not affecting the patients respiratory function. Moreover, it is safe and effective, which is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

Indexed as

AdultAirway ObstructionAnesthetics, IntravenousArterial PressureCase-Control StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationEtomidateFemaleGastroscopyHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansHypoxiaIncidenceInjection Site ReactionMaleAnesthetics, IntravenousEtomidatePropofol

Identifiers

PMID33157963
PMCPMC7647540
OpenAlexW3095848431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.