ArticleMedicine2020
Prognostic factors of patients with initially diagnosed T1a glottic cancer: Novel nomograms and a propensity-score matched cohort analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The option of T1a glottic cancer treatments remarkably varied in different countries. This study aimed to construct predictive models to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with initially diagnosed T1a glottic cancer. And we used propensity score matching (PSM) to reassess the effect of treatments.Data of patients with initially diagnosed T1a glottic cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients with complete information were randomly divided into the training and the validation cohorts (7:3). Cox regression was conducted to screen significant predictors of the OS and the CSS. PSM was performed to mimic randomized controlled trials. Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and log-rank tests were utilized.A total of 2342 patients met the inclusion criteria. Survival analyses showed that patients who underwent primary site surgery would have better OS and CSS. Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses proved that stage, N stage, primary site surgery, and chemotherapy significantly affected both the OS and the CSS. Predictive nomograms were established to predict patients' prognosis. Finally, the OS and the CSS for patients who underwent primary site surgery alone were significantly longer than those who underwent radiation alone before and after PSM.We constructed nomograms predicting the OS and the CSS of patients with initially diagnosed T1a glottic cancer. Compared to our previous studies, this study indicated that primary site surgery may be superior to radiation and chemotherapy. At present, chemotherapy should be not recommended for T1a glottic cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.