SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2021
Treatments of gliosarcoma of the brain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gliosarcoma of the right cerebellar hemisphere and parahippocampal region: A case report and literature review.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Gliosarcoma: A Reappraisal of Neuroradiological, Surgical, Morphological, and Radiotherapeutic Characteristics of a Cohort From South Italy Single-Center.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026Article
- Article
- A case of right fronto-parietal gliosarcoma.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Gliosarcoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis on Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Conditional survival and changing risk profile in patients with gliosarcoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Primary Intracranial Gliosarcoma: Is It Really a Variant of Glioblastoma? An Update of the Clinical, Radiological, and Biomolecular Characteristics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Prognostic Factors of Gliosarcoma in the Real World: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023Article
- Survival outcomes associated with MGMT promoter methylation and temozolomide in gliosarcoma patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a rare central nervous system tumor. Clinical management of it is similar to glioblastoma (GBM). However, due to a few comparative studies exist, uncertainty and disagreements remain in the literatures. To assess the available evidence on the value of different treatments and to carry out an up-to-date evaluation to summarize the evidence for the optimal treatment in GSM patients. Free words were used to search for the relevant studies without language limitations in electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to September 15, 2019. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. The main endpoint was all-cause mortality. Overall, 10 studies published between 2008 and 2018 including 803 patients were selected for the meta-analysis. Temozolomide (TMZ)-dominated chemotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of overall survival (OS), with HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.37-0.66). The pooled HR of OS was 0.40 (95% CI 0.29-0.56) between radiotherapy and without radiotherapy. The pooled HR (0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.85) indicated gross total resection (GTR) had a positive impact on OS in GSM. In patients with GSM, survival benefits as currently performed are associated with TMZ-dominated chemotherapy and high-dose radiotherapy. Our systematic review and meta-analysis also demonstrate GTR is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in patients with primary GSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.